Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27503475›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2016

Cannabigerol is a novel, well-tolerated appetite stimulant in pre-satiated rats.

Daniel I Brierley, James Samuels, Marnie Duncan, Benjamin J Whalley, Claire M Williams

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cannabigerol modulates αFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Medicinal Natural Products ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel I BrierleySchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
James SamuelsSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Marnie DuncanGW Research Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Benjamin J WhalleySchool of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Claire M WilliamsSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK. claire.williams@reading.ac.uk.
University of Reading · GBGW Pharmaceuticals (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe appetite-stimulating properties of cannabis are well documented and have been predominantly attributed to the hyperphagic activity of the psychoactive phytocannabinoid, ∆(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆(9)-THC). However, we have previously shown that a cannabis extract devoid of ∆(9)-THC still stimulates appetite, indicating that other phytocannabinoids also elicit hyperphagia. One possible candidate is the non-psychoactive phytocannabinoid cannabigerol (CBG), which has affinity for several molecular targets with known involvement in the regulation of feeding behaviour.

objectivesThe objective of the study was to assess the effects of CBG on food intake and feeding pattern microstructure.

methodsMale Lister hooded rats were administered CBG (30-120 mg/kg, per ora (p.o.)) or placebo and assessed in open field, static beam and grip strength tests to determine a neuromotor tolerability profile for this cannabinoid. Subsequently, CBG (at 30-240 mg/kg, p.o.) or placebo was administered to a further group of pre-satiated rats, and hourly intake and meal pattern data were recorded over 2 h.

resultsCBG produced no adverse effects on any parameter in the neuromotor tolerability test battery. In the feeding assay, 120-240 mg/kg CBG more than doubled total food intake and increased the number of meals consumed, and at 240 mg/kg reduced latency to feed. However, the sizes or durations of individual meals were not significantly increased.

conclusionsHere, we demonstrate for the first time that CBG elicits hyperphagia, by reducing latency to feed and increasing meal frequency, without producing negative neuromotor side effects. Investigation of the therapeutic potential of CBG for conditions such as cachexia and other disorders of eating and body weight regulation is thus warranted.

Indexed as

AnimalsAppetiteAppetite StimulantsBehavior, AnimalCannabinoidsCannabisEatingFeeding BehaviorHyperphagiaMaleRatsSatiationAppetite StimulantscannabigerolCannabinoidsAppetiteAppetitiveCachexiaCannabigerolCannabisConsummatoryFeedingHyperphagiaPhytocannabinoidTolerability

Identifiers

PMID27503475
PMCPMC5021742
OpenAlexW2514650003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.