Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27503385›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2016

Editor's Highlight: Development of an In vitro Assay Measuring Uterine-Specific Estrogenic Responses for Use in Chemical Safety Assessment.

Michelle M Miller, Rebecca A Alyea, Caroline LeSommer, Daniel L Doheny, Sean M Rowley, Kristin M Childs, Pergentino Balbuena, Susan M Ross, Jian Dong, Bin Sun and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle M Miller*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Rebecca A Alyea*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Caroline LeSommer*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Daniel L Doheny*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Sean M Rowley*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Kristin M Childs*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Pergentino Balbuena*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Susan M Ross*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Jian Dong*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Bin Sun*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Melvin A Andersen*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Rebecca A Clewell*The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; rclewell@scitovation.com.
The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A toxicity pathway approach was taken to develop an in vitro assay using human uterine epithelial adenocarcinoma (Ishikawa) cells as a replacement for measuring an in vivo uterotrophic response to estrogens. The Ishikawa cell was determined to be fit for the purpose of recapitulating in vivo uterine response by verifying fidelity of the biological pathway components and the dose-response predictions to women of child-bearing age. Expression of the suite of estrogen receptors that control uterine proliferation (ERα66, ERα46, ERα36, ERβ, G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER)) were confirmed across passages and treatment conditions. Phenotypic responses to ethinyl estradiol (EE) from transcriptional activation of ER-mediated genes, to ALP enzyme induction and cellular proliferation occurred at concentrations consistent with estrogenic activity in adult women (low picomolar). To confirm utility of this model to predict concentration-response for uterine proliferation with xenobiotics, we tested the concentration-response for compounds with known uterine estrogenic activity in humans and compared the results to assays from the ToxCast and Tox21 suite of estrogen assays. The Ishikawa proliferation assay was consistent with in vivo responses and was a more sensitive measure of uterine response. Because this assay was constructed by first mapping the key molecular events for cellular response, and then ensuring that the assay incorporated these events, the resulting cellular assay should be a reliable tool for identifying estrogenic compounds and may provide improved quantitation of chemical concentration response for in vitro-based safety assessments.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorEpithelial CellsEstrogensEthinyl EstradiolFemaleHumansReceptors, EstrogenUterusXenobioticsEstrogensEthinyl EstradiolReceptors, EstrogenXenobioticsendocrine disruptionhuman health safety assessmentin vitro and alternative models.TT21C

Identifiers

PMID27503385
PMCPMC5091368
OpenAlexW2541010819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.