Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27503297›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Weak Polygenic Selection Drives the Rapid Adaptation of the Chemosensory System: Lessons from the Upstream Regions of the Major Gene Families.

Pablo Librado, Julio Rozas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pablo LibradoDepartament de Genètica, Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Julio RozasDepartament de Genètica, Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain jrozas@ub.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The animal chemosensory system is involved in essential biological processes, most of them mediated by proteins encoded in multigene families. These multigene families have been fundamental for the adaptation to new environments, significantly contributing to phenotypic variation. This adaptive potential contrasts, however, with the lack of studies at their upstream regions, especially taking into account the evidence linking their transcriptional changes to certain phenotypic effects. Here, we explicitly characterize the contribution of the upstream sequences of the major chemosensory gene families to rapid adaptive processes. For that, we analyze the genome sequences of 158 lines from a population of Drosophila melanogaster that recently colonized North America, and integrate functional and transcriptional data available for this species. We find that both, strong negative and strong positive selection, shape transcriptional evolution at the genome-wide level. The chemosensory upstream regions, however, exhibit a distinctive adaptive landscape, including multiple mutations of small beneficial effect and a reduced number of cis-regulatory elements. Together, our results suggest that the promiscuous and partially redundant transcription and function of the chemosensory genes provide evolutionarily opportunities for rapid adaptive episodes through weak polygenic selection.

Indexed as

5' Untranslated RegionsAdaptation, PhysiologicalSelection, GeneticAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularMultigene FamilyPhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, Odorant5' Untranslated RegionsDrosophila Proteinsgustatory receptor, DrosophilaReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, OdorantchemosensoryDrosophilanatural selectiontranscriptionupstream regions

Identifiers

PMID27503297
PMCPMC5010915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.