Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27503138›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2016

A combination of TERT promoter mutation and MGMT methylation status predicts clinically relevant subgroups of newly diagnosed glioblastomas.

Hideyuki Arita, Kai Yamasaki, Yuko Matsushita, Taishi Nakamura, Asanao Shimokawa, Hirokazu Takami, Shota Tanaka, Akitake Mukasa, Mitsuaki Shirahata, Saki Shimizu and 43 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 261 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Independent associations of MGMT promoter methylation and TERT promoter mutation with overall survival in glioblastoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The -124C>T Mutation of theCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

53 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Hideyuki AritaDivision of Brain Tumor Translational Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. neuro.husky@gmail.com.
Kai YamasakiDivision of Brain Tumor Translational Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yuko MatsushitaDivision of Brain Tumor Translational Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Taishi NakamuraDivision of Brain Tumor Translational Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Asanao ShimokawaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu TakamiDivision of Brain Tumor Translational Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Shota TanakaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akitake MukasaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuaki ShirahataDepartment of Neuro-Oncology/Neurosurgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Saki ShimizuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaori SuzukiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kuniaki SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi KobayashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumi HiguchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Takeo UzukaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Ryohei OtaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Kaoru TamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazutaka SumitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto OhnoDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuji MiyakitaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki KagawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Naoya HashimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Ryusuke HataeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan.
Koji YoshimotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Science, Fukuoka, Japan.
Naoki ShinojimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hideo NakamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yonehiro KanemuraDivision of Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Clinical Research, Osaka National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshiko OkitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Manabu KinoshitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan.
Kenichi IshibashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoko ShofudaDivision of Stem Cell Research, Institute for Clinical Research, Osaka National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshinori KodamaCentral Laboratory and Surgical Pathology, Osaka National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Osaka, Japan.
Kanji MoriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Yusuke TomoganeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Junya FukaiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Koji FujitaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yuzo TerakawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Naohiro TsuyuguchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Shusuke MoriuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiro NonakaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyoshi SuzukiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Makoto ShibuyaCentral Laboratory, Hachioji Medical Center, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Taketoshi MaeharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuhito SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoo NaganeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobutaka KawaharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Keisuke UekiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Toshiki YoshimineDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Etsuo MiyaokaDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo NishikawaDepartment of Neuro-Oncology/Neurosurgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Takashi KomoriDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (Neuropathology), Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshitaka NaritaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi IchimuraDivision of Brain Tumor Translational Research, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. kichimur@ncc.go.jp.
Kyorin University · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPDokkyo Medical University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPOsaka University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPKumamoto University · JPKyushu University · JPOsaka City General Hospital · JPOsaka City University · JPSaitama Medical University · JPTokyo University of Science · JPWakayama Medical University · JPYokohama City University · JPHyogo Medical University · JPKansai Rosai Hospital · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPTokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center · JPTokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic impact of TERT mutations has been controversial in IDH-wild tumors, particularly in glioblastomas (GBM). The controversy may be attributable to presence of potential confounding factors such as MGMT methylation status or patients' treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of TERT status on patient outcome in association with various factors in a large series of adult diffuse gliomas. We analyzed a total of 951 adult diffuse gliomas from two cohorts (Cohort 1, n = 758; Cohort 2, n = 193) for IDH1/2, 1p/19q, and TERT promoter status. The combined IDH/TERT classification divided Cohort 1 into four molecular groups with distinct outcomes. The overall survival (OS) was the shortest in IDH wild-type/TERT mutated groups, which mostly consisted of GBMs (P < 0.0001). To investigate the association between TERT mutations and MGMT methylation on survival of patients with GBM, samples from a combined cohort of 453 IDH-wild-type GBM cases treated with radiation and temozolomide were analyzed. A multivariate Cox regression model revealed that the interaction between TERT and MGMT was significant for OS (P = 0.0064). Compared with TERT mutant-MGMT unmethylated GBMs, the hazard ratio (HR) for OS incorporating the interaction was the lowest in the TERT mutant-MGMT methylated GBM (HR, 0.266), followed by the TERT wild-type-MGMT methylated (HR, 0.317) and the TERT wild-type-MGMT unmethylated GBMs (HR, 0.542). Thus, patients with TERT mutant-MGMT unmethylated GBM have the poorest prognosis. Our findings suggest that a combination of IDH, TERT, and MGMT refines the classification of grade II-IV diffuse gliomas.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationPromoter Regions, GeneticAdultAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyDacarbazineDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGlioblastomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseJapanAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBiomarkers, TumorDacarbazineDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTelomeraseTemozolomideTERT protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins1p19qGlioblastomaGliomaIDH1/2Molecular classificationPrognostic factorTemozolomideTERT

Identifiers

PMID27503138
PMCPMC4977715
OpenAlexW2513843238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.