Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27503110›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Use of metabolomics for the identification and validation of clinical biomarkers for preterm birth: Preterm SAMBA.

Jose G Cecatti, Renato T Souza, Karolina Sulek, Maria L Costa, Louise C Kenny, Lesley M McCowan, Rodolfo C Pacagnella, Silas G Villas-Boas, Jussara Mayrink, Renato Passini and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Profile of calories and nutrients intake in a Brazilian multicenter study of nulliparous women.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jose G CecattiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP) School of Medical Sciences, R. Alexander Fleming, 101, Campinas, SP,, 13083-881, Brazil. cecatti@unicamp.br.
Renato T SouzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP) School of Medical Sciences, R. Alexander Fleming, 101, Campinas, SP,, 13083-881, Brazil.
Karolina SulekGravida: National Centre for Growth & Development, Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Maria L CostaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP) School of Medical Sciences, R. Alexander Fleming, 101, Campinas, SP,, 13083-881, Brazil.
Louise C KennyIrish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research (INFANT), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Lesley M McCowanSouth Auckland Clinical School, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Rodolfo C PacagnellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP) School of Medical Sciences, R. Alexander Fleming, 101, Campinas, SP,, 13083-881, Brazil.
Silas G Villas-BoasSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jussara MayrinkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP) School of Medical Sciences, R. Alexander Fleming, 101, Campinas, SP,, 13083-881, Brazil.
Renato PassiniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP) School of Medical Sciences, R. Alexander Fleming, 101, Campinas, SP,, 13083-881, Brazil.
Kleber G FranchiniLNBio-Brazilian Biosciences National Laboratory and School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Philip N BakerGravida: National Centre for Growth & Development, Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Preterm SAMBA and SCOPE study groups
University of Auckland · NZUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous preterm birth is a complex syndrome with multiple pathways interactions determining its occurrence, including genetic, immunological, physiologic, biochemical and environmental factors. Despite great worldwide efforts in preterm birth prevention, there are no recent effective therapeutic strategies able to decrease spontaneous preterm birth rates or their consequent neonatal morbidity/mortality. The Preterm SAMBA study will associate metabolomics technologies to identify clinical and metabolite predictors for preterm birth. These innovative and unbiased techniques might be a strategic key to advance spontaneous preterm birth prediction. METHODS/

designPreterm SAMBA study consists of a discovery phase to identify biophysical and untargeted metabolomics from blood and hair samples associated with preterm birth, plus a validation phase to evaluate the performance of the predictive modelling. The first phase, a case-control study, will randomly select 100 women who had a spontaneous preterm birth (before 37 weeks) and 100 women who had term birth in the Cork Ireland and Auckland New Zealand cohorts within the SCOPE study, an international consortium aimed to identify potential metabolomic predictors using biophysical data and blood samples collected at 20 weeks of gestation. The validation phase will recruit 1150 Brazilian pregnant women from five participant centres and will collect blood and hair samples at 20 weeks of gestation to evaluate the performance of the algorithm model (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios) in predicting spontaneous preterm birth (before 34 weeks, with a secondary analysis of delivery before 37 weeks). DISCUSSION: The Preterm SAMBA study intends to step forward on preterm birth prediction using metabolomics techniques, and accurate protocols for sample collection among multi-ethnic populations. The use of metabolomics in medical science research is innovative and promises to provide solutions for disorders with multiple complex underlying determinants such as spontaneous preterm birth.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMetabolomicsBiomarkersBrazilCase-Control StudiesClinical ProtocolsFemaleHairHumansInfant, NewbornIrelandNew ZealandPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondPremature BirthBiomarkersBiological biomarkerMass spectrometryMetabolomicsPredictionSpontaneous preterm birth

Identifiers

PMID27503110
PMCPMC4977855
OpenAlexW2513887224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.