Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27503035›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2016

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Renal Artery Stenosis.

Edwin A Takahashi, Michael A McKusick, Haraldur Bjarnason, Ameet Piryani, William S Harmsen, Sanjay Misra

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Re: Stating the Obvious, for What It's Worth.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edwin A TakahashiDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
Michael A McKusickDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
Haraldur BjarnasonDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
Ameet PiryaniDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
William S HarmsenDepartment of Clinical Statistics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
Sanjay MisraDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905; Department of Radiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology Translational Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Electronic address: misra.sanjay@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

The Role of Hypoxia In Venous Neointimal Hyperplasia In Hemodialysis GraftsR01HL098967 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sanjay Misra · 2010 to 2026
$10.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine clinical outcomes of patients treated for renal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective review was performed of the clinical data of all patients who underwent renal artery stent placement for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis from 1996 to 2009. Medical records of patients were reviewed for relevant clinical history, including blood pressure, antihypertensive medications, and renal function data before and after an intervention. In 1,052 patients, 1,090 renal artery stent placements were performed. Of these, 101 stents in 79 patients developed ISR, which was treated with either percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or repeat stent placement. Procedural details, including modality of intervention, stent diameter, and time to restenosis, were recorded. Hypertensive agent and use of statins were recorded. Univariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with restenosis after treatment of ISR.

resultsPatients treated with repeat stent placement were 6.89 times more likely to lose patency after treatment than patients treated with PTA (P < .01). No additional clinical or procedural factor, including smoking history; presence of cardiac, renal, or metabolic disease; use of statin at time of ISR treatment; or diameter of treatment (stent or PTA), had a significant association with duration of stent or angioplasty patency.

conclusionsTreatment of renal artery ISR with PTA among patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis has a lower rate of subsequent ISR compared with repeat stent placement.

Indexed as

StentsAgedAged, 80 and overAngioplasty, BalloonAtherosclerosisEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMetalsMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProsthesis DesignRecurrenceRenal Artery ObstructionMetals

Identifiers

PMID27503035
PMCPMC11520194
OpenAlexW2478747641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.