Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27503023›Full record

ArticleChinese medical journal2016

Cryobiological Characteristics of L-proline in Mammalian Oocyte Cryopreservation.

Lu Zhang, Xu Xue, Jie Yan, Li-Ying Yan, Xiao-Hu Jin, Xiao-Hui Zhu, Zhi-Zhu He, Jing Liu, Rong Li, Jie Qiao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Multifaceted Roles of Proline in Cell Behavior.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lu ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproduction, Beijing 100191, China.
Xu XueBeijing Key Laboratory of Cryo-Biomedical Engineering and Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Jie YanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproduction, Beijing 100191, China.
Li-Ying YanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China.
Xiao-Hu JinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproduction, Beijing 100191, China.
Xiao-Hui ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproduction, Beijing 100191, China.
Zhi-Zhu HeBeijing Key Laboratory of Cryo-Biomedical Engineering and Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Jing LiuBeijing Key Laboratory of Cryo-Biomedical Engineering and Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190; Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Rong LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China.
Jie QiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China.
Peking University Third Hospital · CNMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CNTechnical Institute of Physics and Chemistry · CNBeijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital · CNPeking University · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundL-proline is a natural, nontoxic cryoprotectant that helps cells and tissues to tolerate freezing in a variety of plants and animals. The use of L-proline in mammalian oocyte cryopreservation is rare. In this study, we explored the cryobiological characteristics of L-proline and evaluated its protective effect in mouse oocyte cryopreservation.

methodsThe freezing property of L-proline was detected by Raman spectroscopy and osmometer. Mature oocytes obtained from 8-week-old B6D2F1 mice were vitrified in a solution consisting various concentration of L-proline with a reduced proportion of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and ethylene glycol (EG), comparing with the control group (15% DMSO and 15% EG without L-proline). The survival rate, 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) expression, fertilization rate, two-cell rate, and blastocyst rate in vitro were assessed by immunofluorescence and in vitro fertilization. Data were analyzed by Chi-square test.

resultsL-proline can penetrate the oocyte membrane within 1 min. The osmotic pressure of 2.00 mol/L L-proline mixture is similar to that of the control group. The survival rate of the postthawed oocyte in 2.00 mol/L L-proline combining 7.5% DMSO and 10% EG is significantly higher than that of the control group. There is no difference of 5-mC expression between the L-proline combination groups and control. The fertilization rate, two-cell rate, and blastocyst rate in vitro from oocyte vitrified in 2.00 mol/L L-proline combining 7.5% DMSO and 10% EG solution are similar to that of control.

conclusionsIt indicated that an appropriate concentration of L-proline can improve the cryopreservation efficiency of mouse oocytes with low concentrations of DMSO and EG, which may be applicable to human oocyte vitrification.

Indexed as

AnimalsCryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsFemaleFertilization in VitroHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMiceOocytesOsmotic PressureProlineSpectrum Analysis, RamanVitrificationCryoprotective AgentsProline

Identifiers

PMID27503023
PMCPMC4989429
OpenAlexW2485561424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.