Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27502785›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Postoperative surveillance of pediatric cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma.

Raphael Alford, Lynn Gargan, Daniel C Bowers, Laura J Klesse, Bradley Weprin, Korgun Koral

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The benefit of surveillance imaging for paediatric cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2019
    Article
  9. Promoter methylation ofOncology letters · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raphael AlfordDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1935 Medical District Drive, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Lynn GarganDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Children's Health, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Daniel C BowersDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Laura J KlesseDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Bradley WeprinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
Korgun KoralDepartment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1935 Medical District Drive, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA. korgun.koral@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8695-300X
Medical City Children's Hospital · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal frequency and duration of magnetic resonance imaging follow-up in children who had gross totally resected cerebellar pilocytic astrocytomas (CPAs). Our hypothesis was that following two MR examinations, separated by at least 3 months, showing no evidence of tumor, gross totally resected CPAs did not recur and no further imaging follow-up was necessary. Retrospective review of Neuro-Oncology database from 1/2000 to 7/2013 yielded 53 patients with CPAs that had preoperative imaging and >2 years post-operative imaging follow-up available. Pilocytic astrocytomas with brainstem involvement and patients with neurofibromatosis type I were excluded. Preoperative tumor volumes were calculated. The dates and reports of the examinations were tabulated. The median number of follow-up examinations was 9 over a median follow-up time of 6.05 years (2.07-12.28 years). Two consecutive MR examinations over at least a 3 month span demonstrated the smallest negative likelihood ratio of future recurrence (0.15). There was no association of recurrence with preoperative tumor volume. Among the 35 patients with gross total resection of their tumor and greater than two negative follow-up examinations, one recurrence (2.9 %) was identified, occurring 6.4 years after initial resection. Gross totally resected pediatric CPAs can recur, but this is exceedingly rare. Frequent surveillance (every 3-6 months) is suggested in patients with CPAs until absence of tumor is concluded on imaging and documented on two consecutive studies spaced at least 3 months apart. The likelihood of recurrence thereafter is low.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdolescentAstrocytomaCerebellar NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesCerebellarChildrenMagnetic resonance imagingPilocytic astrocytomaSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID27502785
OpenAlexW2515141277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.