Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27502769›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

The Post-Anaesthesia N-acetylcysteine Cognitive Evaluation (PANACEA) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

David R Skvarc, Olivia M Dean, Linda K Byrne, Laura J Gray, Kathryn Ives, Stephen E Lane, Matthew Lewis, Cameron Osborne, Richard Page, Douglas Stupart and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reactive Sulfur Compounds in the Fight against COVID-19.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David R SkvarcSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, 3215, VIC, Australia.
Olivia M DeanInnovations in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment (IMPACT) Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University/Barwon Health Clinical School, Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, 3216, VIC, Australia.
Linda K ByrneSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, 3215, VIC, Australia.
Laura J GraySchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, 3216, VIC, Australia.
Kathryn IvesDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Barwon Health, Bellarine Street, Geelong, 3220, VIC, Australia.
Stephen E LaneSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, 3216, VIC, Australia.
Matthew LewisAged Psychiatry Service, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, 260 Kooyong Road, Caulfield, 3162, Victoria, Australia.
Cameron OsborneDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Barwon Health, Bellarine Street, Geelong, 3220, VIC, Australia.
Richard PageSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, 3216, VIC, Australia.
Douglas StupartDepartment of General Surgery, Barwon Health, Bellarine Street, Geelong, 3220, VIC, Australia.
Alyna TurnerInnovations in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment (IMPACT) Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University/Barwon Health Clinical School, Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, 3216, VIC, Australia.
Michael BerkInnovations in Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Treatment (IMPACT) Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University/Barwon Health Clinical School, Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, 3216, VIC, Australia.
Andrew J MarriottDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Management, Barwon Health, Bellarine Street, Geelong, 3220, VIC, Australia. amarri@barwonhealth.org.au.
Barwon Health · AUDeakin University · AUAlfred Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome degree of cognitive decline after surgery occurs in as many as one quarter of elderly surgical patients, and this decline is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Cognition may be affected across a range of domains, including memory, psychomotor skills, and executive function. Whilst the exact mechanisms of cognitive change after surgery are not precisely known, oxidative stress and subsequent neuroinflammation have been implicated. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) acts via multiple interrelated mechanisms to influence oxidative homeostasis, neuronal transmission, and inflammation. NAC has been shown to reduce oxidative stress and inflammation in both human and animal models. There is clinical evidence to suggest that NAC may be beneficial in preventing the cognitive decline associated with both acute physiological insults and dementia-related disorders. To date, no trials have examined perioperative NAC as a potential moderator of postoperative cognitive changes in the noncardiac surgery setting. METHODS AND

designThis is a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, with a between-group, repeated-measures, longitudinal design. The study will recruit 370 noncardiac surgical patients at the University Hospital Geelong, aged 60 years or older. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either NAC or placebo (1:1 ratio), and groups are stratified by age and surgery type. Participants undergo a series of neuropsychological tests prior to surgery, 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months post surgery. It is hypothesised that the perioperative administration of NAC will reduce the degree of postoperative cognitive changes at early and long-term follow-up, as measured by changes on individual measures of the neurocognitive battery, when compared with placebo. Serum samples are taken on the day of surgery and on day 2 post surgery to quantitate any changes in levels of biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress. DISCUSSION: The PANACEA trial aims to examine the potential efficacy of perioperative NAC to reduce the severity of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in an elderly, noncardiac surgery population. This is an entirely novel approach to the prevention of postoperative cognitive dysfunction and will have high impact and translatable outcomes if NAC is found to be beneficial.

trial registrationThe PANACEA trial has been registered with the Therapeutic Goods Administration, and the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614000411640 ; registered on 15 April 2014.

Indexed as

AcetylcysteineAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsBiomarkersClinical ProtocolsCognitionCognition DisordersDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansInflammation MediatorsMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsAcetylcysteineAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsBiomarkersInflammation MediatorsAnaesthesia and cognitive deficitAnaestheticsAntioxidantCognitive dysfunctionDeliriumDementiaN-acetylcysteineOxidative stressSurgerySurgical stress response

Identifiers

PMID27502769
PMCPMC4977889
OpenAlexW2508362814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.