Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27502372›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Clarifying the confusion: old-growth savannahs and tropical ecosystem degradation.

Joseph W Veldman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. WASP: the World Archives of Species Perception.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Floristic evidence for alternative biome states in tropical Africa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. High plant diversity and slow assembly of old-growth grasslands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Tropical grassy biomes: linking ecology, human use and conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  15. Understanding patterns of land-cover change in the Brazilian Cerrado from 2000 to 2015.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joseph W VeldmanDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA Instituto Boliviano de Investigación Forestal-UAGRM, Km 9 carr. norte, el Vallecito, Casilla 6204, Santa Cruz, Bolivia jveldman@iastate.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6231-8223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancient tropical grassy biomes are often misrecognized as severely degraded forests. I trace this confusion to several factors, with roots in the nineteenth century, including misinterpretations of the nature of fire in savannahs, attempts to reconcile savannah ecology with Clementsian succession, use of physiognomic (structural) definitions of savannah and development of tropical degradation frameworks focused solely on forests. Towards clarity, I present two models that conceptualize the drivers of ecosystem degradation as operating in both savannahs and forests. These models highlight how human-induced environmental changes create ecosystems with superficially similar physiognomies but radically different conservation values. Given the limitation of physiognomy to differentiate savannahs from severely degraded forests, I present an alternative approach based on floristic composition. Data from eastern lowland Bolivia show that old-growth savannahs can be reliably distinguished by eight grass species and that species identity influences ecosystem flammability. I recommend that scientists incorporate savannahs in tropical degradation frameworks alongside forests, and that savannah be qualified as old-growth savannah in reference to ancient grassy biomes or derived savannah in reference to deforestation. These conceptual advances will require attention not only to tree cover, but also to savannah herbaceous plant species and their ecologies.This article is part of the themed issue 'Tropical grassy biomes: linking ecology, human use and conservation'.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesForestsGrasslandTropical ClimateBoliviaModels, BiologicalAmazonCerradograsslandrestorationtropical forestwoodland

Identifiers

PMID27502372
PMCPMC4978865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.