Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27502350›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2016

Female Sexual Function Index Short Version: A MsFLASH Item Response Analysis.

Janet S Carpenter, Salene M W Jones, Christina R Studts, Julia R Heiman, Susan D Reed, Katherine M Newton, Katherine A Guthrie, Joseph C Larson, Lee S Cohen, Ellen W Freeman and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lights on MsFLASH: a review of contributions.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Validation of the Six-item Female Sexual Function Index in Middle-Aged Brazilian Women.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2019
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Janet S CarpenterDepartment of Science of Nursing Care, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. carpentj@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3988-8855
Salene M W JonesGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Christina R StudtsDepartment of Health Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Julia R HeimanPsychological & Brain Sciences, The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Susan D ReedDepartments of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Katherine M NewtonGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Katherine A GuthrieData Coordinating Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joseph C LarsonData Coordinating Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lee S CohenCenter for Women's Mental Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ellen W FreemanDepartments of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
R Jane LauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Lee A LearmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jan L ShifrenMassachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USHarvard University · USIndiana University Bloomington · USIndiana University Indianapolis · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Menopausal Symptoms Initiative-Finding Lasting Answers for Sweats and Hot FlashesU01AG032699 · NIA · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GUTHRIE, KATHERINE ADAMS, LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2008 to 2012
$13.5M
MsFLASH: Living a Healthy MenopauseR01AG048209 · NIA · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GUTHRIE, KATHERINE ADAMS, LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2015 to 2019
$7.2M
MSI-FLASH: Relative Efficacy of Hormonal and Non-Hormonal Interventions for VMSU01AG032700 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI COHEN, LEE S, JOFFE, HADINE · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
MSI FLASH: An RCT of Yoga and Ultra Low-Dose Estrogen Gel for Vasomotor SymptomsU01AG032682 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI NEWTON, KATHERINE M. · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
Efficacy of an SSRI for Menopausal Symptoms in Perimenopausal WomenU01AG032656 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FREEMAN, ELLEN W · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
MSI-FLASH: Paced Respiration for Breast Cancer SurvivorsU01AG032659 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CARPENTER, JANET S · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
MSI-FLASH: An Exercise Intervention for Women with Menopausal SymptomsU01AG032669 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CAAN, BETTE J · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG048209NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032656NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032659NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032669NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032682NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032699NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a psychometrically sound and popular 19-item self-report measure, but its length may preclude its use in studies with multiple outcome measures, especially when sexual function is not a primary endpoint. Only one attempt has been made to create a shorter scale, resulting in the Italian FSFI-6, later translated into Spanish and Korean without further psychometric analysis. Our study evaluated whether a subset of items on the 19-item English-language FSFI would perform as well as the full-length FSFI in peri- and postmenopausal women. We used baseline data from 898 peri- and postmenopausal women recruited from multiple communities, ages 42-62 years, and enrolled in randomized controlled trials for vasomotor symptom management. Goals were to (1) create a psychometrically sound, shorter version of the FSFI for use in peri- and postmenopausal women as a continuous measure and (2) compare it to the Italian FSFI-6. Results indicated that a 9-item scale provided more information than the FSFI-6 across a spectrum of sexual functioning, was able to capture sample variability, and showed sufficient range without floor or ceiling effects. All but one of the items from the Italian 6-item version were included in the 9-item version. Most omitted FSFI items focused on frequency of events or experiences. When assessment of sexual function is a secondary endpoint and subject burden related to questionnaire length is a priority, the 9-item FSFI may provide important information about sexual function in English-speaking peri- and postmenopausal women.

Indexed as

PsychometricsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf ReportSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalTranslatingFemale Sexual Function IndexMenopausePsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID27502350
PMCPMC5053877
OpenAlexW2486478733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.