Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27502239›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2016

Non-invasive real-time biopsy of intracranial lesions using short time expanded circulating tumor cells on glass slide: report of two cases.

N Malara, G Guzzi, C Mignogna, V Trunzo, C Camastra, A Della Torre, A Di Vito, A M Lavecchia, M Gliozzi, C Ceccotti and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CSF Biopsy in Glioma: A Brief Review.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Role of Macrophages in Brain Tumor Growth and Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N MalaraIRC-FSH Laboratories Department of Health Science, University Magna Graecia, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy. nataliamalara@unicz.it.
G GuzziNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgery Science, University "Magna Graecia", 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
C MignognaPathological Anatomy, Department of Health Science, University "Magna Graecia", 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
V TrunzoCellular Toxicological Laboratory. Department of Health Science, Salvatore Venuta Campus, University "Magna Graecia", 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
C CamastraPathological Anatomy, Department of Health Science, University "Magna Graecia", 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
A Della TorreNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgery Science, University "Magna Graecia", 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
A Di VitoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia", 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
A M LavecchiaAnatomical and Pathological Sciences, Pugliese-Ciaccio Hospital, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
M GliozziIRC-FSH Laboratories Department of Health Science, University Magna Graecia, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
C CeccottiNeurosurgery Unit, Pugliese-Ciaccio Hospital, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
G VolpentestaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgery Science, University "Magna Graecia", 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
A LavanoNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgery Science, University "Magna Graecia", 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
G DonatoPathological Anatomy, Department of Health Science, University "Magna Graecia", 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
V MollaceIRC-FSH Laboratories Department of Health Science, University Magna Graecia, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
Magna Graecia University · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Pugliese Ciaccio · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating Tumor Cells (CTCs) are promising biomarkers for monitoring solid cancer and were used to monitor brain tumors. Here we report two cases in which, for the first time, CTCs were used in cytological diagnostic evaluation to discriminate a space-occupying lesion of the brain. CASE PRESENTATION: Two cases of focal intracranial lesions, unclassified for diagnosis, untreated and apparently symptomatic, were examined after high-contrast resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging and/or Computed Tomography scans. CTCs were seeded on chamber slides and short-time expanded under the optimized conditions as we previously reported. The first case was a focal lesion localized in the parietal-occipital area in a 67-year-old woman. The second case was a 31-year-old man with an expansive intracerebral lesion localized in the left peri-trigonal area. Both patients underwent excisional biopsy. Histopathological evaluation of the biopsy confirmed the previous cytological diagnoses, and the analysis of the clinical outcomes retrospectively validated both diagnoses.

conclusionsThe cases here reported illustrate the potential for using expanded CTCs as non-invasive, real-time biopsy. Moreover, non-invasive real-time biopsy can represent an alternative diagnostic tool to be used when a functional area of the brain is at risk of injury from excisional biopsy procedures.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAstrocytomaBiopsyBrain NeoplasmsCells, CulturedContrast MediaCytodiagnosisFemaleGlioblastomaHumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasms, Second PrimaryNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingContrast MediaCirculating tumor cellsIntracranial tumorShort-term expansion

Identifiers

PMID27502239
PMCPMC4976507
OpenAlexW2483924565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.