Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27502196›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2016

Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion in septic patients: analysis of a multicenter registry.

Salvatore Lucio Cutuli, Antonio Artigas, Roberto Fumagalli, Gianpaola Monti, Vito Marco Ranieri, Claudio Ronco, Massimo Antonelli, EUPHAS 2 Collaborative Group

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03807414 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Development of a Web-based Multicenter Registry on the Use of oXiris Membrane for Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapies in Critically Ill Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorCareggi HospitalRan2019 to 2025Enrolled270ConditionsCritical Illness, Acute Kidney Injury, Sepsis, Systemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeArmsoXiris
NCT04033224 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Use of EBPT in Critically Ill Patients With AKI and/or Multiorgan Failure: a Multicenter Prospective Observational Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCareggi HospitalRan2019 to 2025Enrolled1,000ConditionsCritical Illness, Acute Kidney Injury, Sepsis, Systemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeArmsCommercial membrane for Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapy (EBPT)
NCT04580680 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: an Interactive,Web-based,Multicenter,Observational Prospective Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCareggi HospitalRan2020 to 2025Enrolled1,000ConditionsCritical Illness, Acute Kidney Injury, Sepsis, Systemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeArmsCommercial membrane for Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapy (EBPT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Endotoxins and Biological Implications-Review.Public health challenges · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Efficacy of Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion for Treatment of Sepsis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Immune Modulation in Critically Ill Septic Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Salvatore Lucio CutuliDepartment of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. sl.cutuli@gmail.com.
Antonio ArtigasCritical Care Center, Sabadell Hospital, CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias, Corporació Sanitària Universitària Parc Taulí, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.
Roberto FumagalliDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Gianpaola MontiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Vito Marco RanieriDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Claudio RoncoDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Massimo AntonelliDepartment of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
EUPHAS 2 Collaborative Group
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESInternational Renal Research Institute of Vicenza · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2010, the EUPHAS 2 collaborative group created a registry with the purpose of recording data from critically ill patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock treated with polymyxin-B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) for endotoxin removal. The aim of the registry was to verify the application of PMX-HP in the daily clinical practice.

methodsThe EUPHAS 2 registry involved 57 centers between January 2010 and December 2014, collecting retrospective data of 357 patients (297 in Europe and 60 in Asia) suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock caused by proved or suspected infection related to Gram negative bacteria. All patients received atleast one cycle of extracorporeal endotoxin removal by PMX-HP.

resultsSeptic shock was diagnosed in 305 (85.4 %) patients. The most common source of infection was abdominal (44.0 %) followed by pulmonary (17.6 %). Gram negative bacteria represented 60.6 % of the pathogens responsible of infection. After 72 h from the first cycle of PMX-HP, some of the SOFA score components significantly improved with respect to baseline: cardiovascular (2.16 ± 1.77 from 3.32 ± 1.29, p < 0.0001), respiratory (1.95 ± 0.95 from 2.40 ± 1.06, p < 0.001) and renal (1.84 ± 1.77 from 2.23 ± 1.62, p = 0.013). Overall 28-day survival rate was 54.5 % (60.4 % in abdominal and 47.5 % in pulmonary infection). Patients with abdominal infection treated with PMX-HP within 24 h from the diagnosis of septic shock had a 28-day survival rate of 64.5 %. Patients showing a significantly cardiovascular improvement after PMX-HP had a 28-survival rate of 75 % in comparison to the 39 % of patients who did not (p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis found the variation of cardiovascular, respiratory and coagulation SOFA to be independent covariates for 28-day survival. In European patients were observed a higher 28-day (58.8 vs. 34.5 %, p = 0.003), ICU (59 vs. 36.7 %, p = 0.006) and hospital survival rate (53.2 vs. 35 %, p = 0.02) than in Asian patients. However, the two populations were highly heterogeneous in terms of source of infection and severity scores at admission.

conclusionThe EUPHAS 2 is the largest registry conducted outside Japan on the clinical use of PMX-HP in septic patients. Data analysis confirmed the feasibility of PMX-HP to treat septic patients in daily clinical practice, showing clinical benefits associated with endotoxin removal without significant adverse events related to the extracorporeal technique.

Indexed as

EAAExtracorporeal endotoxin removalInfectionPolymyxin-B hemoperfusionSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID27502196
PMCPMC4977232
OpenAlexW2509212859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.