ArticleAnnals of intensive care2016
Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion in septic patients: analysis of a multicenter registry.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development of a Web-based Multicenter Registry on the Use of oXiris Membrane for Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapies in Critically Ill Patients
Use of EBPT in Critically Ill Patients With AKI and/or Multiorgan Failure: a Multicenter Prospective Observational Registry
Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: an Interactive,Web-based,Multicenter,Observational Prospective Registry
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polymyxin B hemoperfusion in endotoxemic septic shock patients without extreme endotoxemia: a post hoc analysis of the EUPHRATES trial.Intensive care medicine · 2018Trial
- Endotoxins and Biological Implications-Review.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Differential Impact of Polymyxin B Hemadsorption on Long-Term Mortality in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Analysis of Intra-Abdominal Versus Extra-Abdominal Infections.Artificial organs · 2026Article
- Clinical applications for the endotoxin activity assay in sepsis: a scoping review.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Microbiological and Infection-Source Predictors of Mortality in Severe Sepsis Patients Undergoing Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion: A Seven-Year Real-World Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Extracorporeal therapies in sepsis: a comprehensive review of the Selective Cytopheretic Device, Polymyxin B and Seraph cartridges.Renal failure · 2025Review
- TIGRIS and EUPHRATES eventually join and provide new evidence: a narrative review of the polymyxin B hemoperfusion.Journal of intensive care · 2025Review
- Endotoxin hemoadsorption in refractory septic shock with multiorgan dysfunction and extreme endotoxin activity.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Time to administer polymyxin B hemoperfusion and hemodynamics in patients with septic shock requiring high-dose norepinephrine: a predetermined analysis of a prospective cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Haemoadsorption to remove inflammatory mediators in sepsis: past, present, and future.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Review
- Endotoxin Hemoperfusion as an Adjuvant Therapy for Sepsis: Lessons from the TIGRIS Trial.Juntendo medical journal · 2025Review
- Efficacy of Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion for Treatment of Sepsis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration with oXiris hemofilters for the treatment of Fournier's gangrene: A case report series.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Endotoxin removal therapy with Polymyxin B immobilized fiber column: a single center experience from EUPHAS2 registry.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- Antimicrobial Exposure in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis-Associated Multi-Organ Dysfunction Requiring Extracorporeal Organ Support: A Narrative Review.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- The Supporting Role of Combined and Sequential Extracorporeal Blood Purification Therapies in COVID-19 Patients in Intensive Care Unit.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- The Rationale and Current Status of Endotoxin Adsorption in the Treatment of Septic Shock.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Impact of polymyxin B hemoperfusion therapy on high endotoxin activity level patients after successful infection source control: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Immune Modulation in Critically Ill Septic Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Therapeutic Rationale for Endotoxin Removal with Polymyxin B Immobilized Fiber Column (PMX) for Septic Shock.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2010, the EUPHAS 2 collaborative group created a registry with the purpose of recording data from critically ill patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock treated with polymyxin-B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) for endotoxin removal. The aim of the registry was to verify the application of PMX-HP in the daily clinical practice.
methodsThe EUPHAS 2 registry involved 57 centers between January 2010 and December 2014, collecting retrospective data of 357 patients (297 in Europe and 60 in Asia) suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock caused by proved or suspected infection related to Gram negative bacteria. All patients received atleast one cycle of extracorporeal endotoxin removal by PMX-HP.
resultsSeptic shock was diagnosed in 305 (85.4 %) patients. The most common source of infection was abdominal (44.0 %) followed by pulmonary (17.6 %). Gram negative bacteria represented 60.6 % of the pathogens responsible of infection. After 72 h from the first cycle of PMX-HP, some of the SOFA score components significantly improved with respect to baseline: cardiovascular (2.16 ± 1.77 from 3.32 ± 1.29, p < 0.0001), respiratory (1.95 ± 0.95 from 2.40 ± 1.06, p < 0.001) and renal (1.84 ± 1.77 from 2.23 ± 1.62, p = 0.013). Overall 28-day survival rate was 54.5 % (60.4 % in abdominal and 47.5 % in pulmonary infection). Patients with abdominal infection treated with PMX-HP within 24 h from the diagnosis of septic shock had a 28-day survival rate of 64.5 %. Patients showing a significantly cardiovascular improvement after PMX-HP had a 28-survival rate of 75 % in comparison to the 39 % of patients who did not (p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis found the variation of cardiovascular, respiratory and coagulation SOFA to be independent covariates for 28-day survival. In European patients were observed a higher 28-day (58.8 vs. 34.5 %, p = 0.003), ICU (59 vs. 36.7 %, p = 0.006) and hospital survival rate (53.2 vs. 35 %, p = 0.02) than in Asian patients. However, the two populations were highly heterogeneous in terms of source of infection and severity scores at admission.
conclusionThe EUPHAS 2 is the largest registry conducted outside Japan on the clinical use of PMX-HP in septic patients. Data analysis confirmed the feasibility of PMX-HP to treat septic patients in daily clinical practice, showing clinical benefits associated with endotoxin removal without significant adverse events related to the extracorporeal technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.