Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27502101›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2016

Breast pumps as an incentive for breastfeeding: a mixed methods study of acceptability.

Nicola Crossland, Gill Thomson, Heather Morgan, Graeme MacLennan, Marion Campbell, Fiona Dykes, Pat Hoddinott

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Marketing BreastInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Ecological Momentary Assessment of Primiparous Women's Breastfeeding Behavior and Problems From Birth to 8 Weeks.Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association · 2017
    Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola CrosslandMaternal and Infant Nutrition & Nurture Unit (MAINN), School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom. ncrossland@uclan.ac.uk.
Gill ThomsonMaternal and Infant Nutrition & Nurture Unit (MAINN), School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Heather MorganHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Graeme MacLennanHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Marion CampbellHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Fiona DykesMaternal and Infant Nutrition & Nurture Unit (MAINN), School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Pat HoddinottNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, United Kingdom.
University of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Central Lancashire · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU2Chief Scientist Office NMAHP2Department of Health 10/31/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing breastfeeding rates would improve maternal and child health, but multiple barriers to breastfeeding persist. Breast pump provision has been used as an incentive for breastfeeding, although effectiveness is unclear. Women's use of breast pumps is increasing and a high proportion of mothers express breastmilk. No research has yet reported women's and health professionals' perspectives on breast pumps as an incentive for breastfeeding. In the Benefits of Incentives for Breastfeeding and Smoking cessation in pregnancy (BIBS) study, mixed methods research explored women's and professionals' views of breast pumps as an incentive for breastfeeding. A survey of health professionals across Scotland and North West England measured agreement with 'a breast pump costing around £40 provided for free on the NHS' as an incentive strategy. Qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted in two UK regions with a total of 68 participants (pregnant women, new mothers, and their significant others and health professionals) and thematic analysis undertaken. The survey of 497 health professionals found net agreement of 67.8% (337/497) with the breast pump incentive strategy, with no predictors of agreement shown by a multiple ordered logistic regression model. Qualitative research found interrelated themes of the 'appeal and value of breast pumps', 'sharing the load', 'perceived benefits', 'perceived risks' and issues related to 'timing'. Qualitative participants expressed mixed views on the acceptability of breast pumps as an incentive for breastfeeding. Understanding the mechanisms of action for pump type, timing and additional support required for effectiveness is required to underpin trials of breast pump provision as an incentive for improving breastfeeding outcomes. © 2016 The Authors. Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Indexed as

MotivationAdolescentAdultAgedBreast FeedingBreast Milk ExpressionEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMothersQualitative Researchacceptabilitybreastfeedingbreast milk expressionbreast pumpIncentives

Identifiers

PMID27502101
PMCPMC5096021
OpenAlexW2513309482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.