Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27501994›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2016

Maximizing the benefits and minimizing the risks of intervention programs to address micronutrient malnutrition: symposium report.

Maaike J Bruins, Roland Kupka, Michael B Zimmermann, Georg Lietz, Reina Engle-Stone, Klaus Kraemer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Maaike J BruinsDSM Biotechnology Center, Delft, The Netherlands. maaike.bruins@DSM.com.
Roland KupkaUNICEF, New York, USA.
Michael B ZimmermannDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Georg LietzNewcastle University, Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Reina Engle-StoneUniversity of California, Davis, California, USA.
Klaus KraemerJohns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
DSM (Netherlands) · NLETH Zurich · CHNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre · GBSight and Life · CHUnited Nations Children's Fund · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions to address micronutrient deficiencies have large potential to reduce the related disease and economic burden. However, the potential risks of excessive micronutrient intakes are often not well determined. During the Global Summit on Food Fortification, 9-11 September 2015, in Arusha, a symposium was organized on micronutrient risk-benefit assessments. Using case studies on folic acid, iodine and vitamin A, the presenters discussed how to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of intervention programs to address micronutrient malnutrition. Pre-implementation assessment of dietary intake, and/or biomarkers of micronutrient exposure, status and morbidity/mortality is critical in identifying the population segments at risk of inadequate and excessive intake. Dietary intake models allow to predict the effect of micronutrient interventions and their combinations, e.g. fortified food and supplements, on the proportion of the population with intakes below adequate and above safe thresholds. Continuous monitoring of micronutrient intake and biomarkers is critical to identify whether the target population is actually reached, whether subgroups receive excessive amounts, and inform program adjustments. However, the relation between regular high intake and adverse health consequences is neither well understood for many micronutrients, nor do biomarkers exist that can detect them. More accurate and reliable biomarkers predictive of micronutrient exposure, status and function are needed to ensure effective and safe intake ranges for vulnerable population groups such as young children and pregnant women. Modelling tools that integrate information on program coverage, dietary intake distribution and biomarkers will further enable program makers to design effective, efficient and safe programs.

Indexed as

Congresses as TopicDietDietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedHealth PromotionHumansMalnutritionMicronutrientsPublic HealthRecommended Dietary AllowancesRisk AssessmentMicronutrientsfood fortificationmicronutrient malnutritionnutritional interventionsnutritional supplementspublic healthrisk-benefit assessment

Identifiers

PMID27501994
PMCPMC5095875
OpenAlexW2511073323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.