Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27501966›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim compared with placebo in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: post hoc analysis of elderly versus younger patients.

Constantin Volovat, Igor Bondarenko, Oleg Gladkov, Anton Buchner, Andreas Lammerich, Udo Müller, Peter Bias

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Constantin VolovatCentrul de Oncologie Medicala, Vasile Conta 2 Str, 700106, Iasi, Romania. cvolovat@yahoo.com.
Igor BondarenkoDnipropetrovsk State Medical Academy, City Clinical Hospital N 4, 31, Blizhnaya str, Dnipropetrovsk, 49102, Ukraine.
Oleg GladkovChelyabinsk Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, 42, Blukhera str, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454087.
Anton BuchnerTeva ratiopharm, Merckle GmbH, Graf-Arco-Strasse 3, 89079, Ulm, Germany.
Andreas LammerichTeva ratiopharm, Merckle GmbH, Graf-Arco-Strasse 3, 89079, Ulm, Germany.
Udo MüllerTeva ratiopharm, Merckle GmbH, Graf-Arco-Strasse 3, 89079, Ulm, Germany.
Peter BiasTeva ratiopharm, Merckle GmbH, Graf-Arco-Strasse 3, 89079, Ulm, Germany.
Merck (Germany) · DEChelyabinsk Regional Clinical Oncology Center · RUDnipro State Medical University · UAInstitutul Regional de Oncologie · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLipegfilgrastim, a glycoPEGylated recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), reduces neutropenia duration and febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. A phase 3 trial of lipegfilgrastim was conducted in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving cisplatin/etoposide (which produces mild-to-moderate myelosuppression). Because patients aged >65 years are at higher risk for FN versus younger patients, this post hoc analysis compared outcomes in elderly (>65 years) versus younger participants in this trial.

methodsPatients were randomized 2:1 to receive a once-per-cycle single subcutaneous injection of lipegfilgrastim 6 mg or placebo, with up to 4 cycles of every-3-week cisplatin (day 1) and etoposide (days 1-3). The primary end point was FN incidence during cycle 1. Outcomes were compared across treatment groups and by age groups (≤65 and >65 years).

resultsFor patients aged ≤65 years, FN incidence during cycle 1 was similar in the lipegfilgrastim and placebo groups (3.0 vs 3.2 %, respectively), whereas for elderly patients, there was a reduction in FN incidence with lipegfilgrastim (0 vs 13.3 %, respectively). In both age subgroups, lipegfilgrastim showed a propensity to reduce the incidence and duration of severe neutropenia, time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery, and depth of ANC nadir. Adverse events were generally similar between groups.

conclusionsThis analysis suggests that in patients with a higher FN risk, such as the elderly patients of this study, lipegfilgrastim reduces not only the duration of severe neutropenia but also the incidence of FN.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant ProteinsFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorpegfilgrastimPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant ProteinsElderlyNeutropeniaNon-small cell lung cancerPhase 3 clinical trialRecombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

Identifiers

PMID27501966
OpenAlexW2526119662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.