Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27501902›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology2016

Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer.

Manuela Durando, Lucas Gennaro, Gene Y Cho, Dilip D Giri, Merlin M Gnanasigamani, Sujata Patil, Elizabeth J Sutton, Joseph O Deasy, Elizabeth A Morris, Sunitha B Thakur

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Breast Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Current Applications, Insights from Screening, and Future Directions.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multimodal apparent diffusion MRI model in noninvasive evaluation of breast cancer and Ki-67 expression.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Non-contrast Breast MR Imaging.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuela DurandoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, A. O. U. Città della Salute e della Scienza of Turin, 10126, Italy. Electronic address: mdurando@inwind.it.
Lucas GennaroDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East, 66th street, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: gennarol@mskcc.org.
Gene Y ChoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East, 66th street, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: chog@mskcc.org.
Dilip D GiriDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East 66th street, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: girid@mskcc.org.
Merlin M GnanasigamaniDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: merlinmargaret@gmail.com.
Sujata PatilDepartment of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: patils@mskcc.org.
Elizabeth J SuttonDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East, 66th street, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: suttone@mskcc.org.
Joseph O DeasyDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: deasyj@mskcc.org.
Elizabeth A MorrisDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East, 66th street, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: morrise@mskcc.org.
Sunitha B ThakurDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 300 East, 66th street, NY 10065, USA; Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: thakurs@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the association between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and histological prognostic parameters in malignant breast lesions. The ability of ADC to identify lesions with the presence of Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in breast carcinoma was also examined. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis HIPAA-compliant retrospective study consisted of 212 consecutive patients with known cancers who underwent 3.0T MRI between January 2011 and 2013. In this study, a total of 126 malignant lesions in 114 women, who had undergone DWI (b-values of 0 and 1000s/mm(2)) in addition to diagnostic MRI, were included. Patients with less than 0.8cm lesions, or those who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or suboptimal DW images were excluded. Classical prognostic factors [lesion size, histopathological type and grade, lymph node (LN) status and lymphovascular invasion (LVI)], molecular prognostic markers [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal grow factor receptor 2 (HER2)] were reviewed and recorded. A region of interest (ROI) was drawn within the lesions to measure ADC values. Statistical analyses were performed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test (statistical significance at P<0.05). Adjusted p values from multiple comparison analysis were also calculated.

resultsThis study demonstrates an inverse correlation between ADC and LVI in malignant lesions and the ability of ADC to identify aggressiveness in lesions with positive LVI. Tumor size, grade, ER, PR, HER2 and lymph node status did not impact tumor ADC value. However, tumors with LVI showed significantly lower ADC values when compared to tumors without LVI, regardless of the enhancement type, histological grade, histological type, and LN status.

conclusionOur study shows that ADC could be a potential clinical adjunct in the evaluation of prognostic factors related to malignant lesion aggressiveness such as LVI.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast cancerDW-MRI at 3.0TLymph nodesLymphovascular invasionPrognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID27501902
PMCPMC5505563
OpenAlexW2465620739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.