Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27501800›Full record

SynthesisSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2017

[Chronic low back pain and psychological comorbidity : A review].

J Bletzer, S Gantz, T Voigt, E Neubauer, M Schiltenwolf

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J BletzerZentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland. jutta.bletzer@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
S GantzZentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
T VoigtZentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
E NeubauerZentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
M SchiltenwolfZentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBack pain is a common, disabling problem in Germany. Previous research has evaluated associations between low back pain (LBP), depression, and fear.

objectivesThe results should provide ideas of how to optimize preventive measures, give guidelines for rehabilitation of patients with LBP, and to develop new therapies. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic review of the literature including primary publications and meta-analyses using set search criteria in PubMed was performed. A meta-analysis was then done.

resultsIn all, 34 studies met the inclusion and quality criteria, whereby 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the literature, significantly different depression scores were reported for people with LBP compared to a healthy control group. The pain perception in persons with LBP is associated with depression and fear. The correlation between depression and pain perception was highly significant in 5 studies (p < 0.01) and significant in 8 studies (p < 0.05). Fear and pain perception were highly significant in 4 studies (highly significant, p < 0.01) and significant in 3 studies (p < 0.05); 5 studies had no significant results. The studies were very heterogeneous.

conclusionsThe results can improve the understanding of the complexity of LBP perception and its therapy. The generalization of the results is limited. To cover the correlation of psychosocial and lifestyle factors and pain perception of LBP, further research is required. To obtain a clearer picture of pain perception in persons with LBP, standardized pain assessment would be beneficial. In addition, we recommend that future studies follow standardized procedures to allow greater comparability.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAnxiety DisordersAvoidance LearningCatastrophizationComorbidityDepressive DisorderDisability EvaluationFearHumansLife StyleLow Back PainPain PerceptionSick RoleStatistics as TopicAnxietyCatastrophizingDepressionLifestyleReview, systematic

Identifiers

PMID27501800
OpenAlexW2498505245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.