ArticleWorld journal of surgery2017
Nipple Preservation in Breast Cancer Associated with Nipple Discharge.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- ASO Author Reflections: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients with Nipple Discharge.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Initial oncological outcomes of nipple- and areola-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer with nipple discharge.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- An update on multimodal imaging strategies for nipple discharge: from detection to decision.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery improves cosmetic outcomes without increasing recurrence risk compared to modified radical mastectomy in early breast cancer patients: development and validation of a recurrence risk prediction model.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Article
- A nomogram based on clinical factors for preoperative prediction of nipple involvement in breast cancer.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Use of preoperative mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI to predict nipple areolar complex involvement in breast cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on nipple-sparing mastectomy.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2018Review
- Oncological Safety and Technical Feasibility of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: The Hong Kong Experience.World journal of surgery · 2018Article
- The impact of malignant nipple discharge cytology (NDc) in surgical management of breast cancer patients.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast carcinoma presented with nipple discharge is a rare condition. There is theoretical concern about preserving nipple in these patients since the risk of nipple-areolar complex involvement may be greater, but not many studies in the literature have addressed on this issue. The aim of the current study was to determine the incidence and outcome of nipple preservation in breast cancer associated with nipple discharge.
methodsMedical records of patients who were diagnosed to have breast carcinoma and presented with nipple discharge from May 2009 to October 2014 were retrospectively reviewed.
resultsSixty patients presented with nipple discharge were diagnosed with breast cancer, which represent 3.8 % of all patients who underwent breast cancer surgery in our unit during the study period. Forty-six patients (76.7 %) had nipple discharge as their only symptom, while the rest also presented with breast mass clinically or radiologically. All patients had mammogram and ultrasound performed, and 53.3 and 63.3 % respectively showed suspicious findings. Forty-one out of 46 (89.1 %) nipple discharge cytology were inadequate or benign. Thirty-two microdochectomy were performed. Routine frozen section was utilized intra-operatively to ensure clear margins. The most common histology was ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 29, 48.3 %), followed by DCIS with invasive ductal carcinoma (n = 23, 38.3 %). Regarding treatment, 26 patients (43.3 %) had nipple preserved, including 21 breast conservative surgery and five nipple-sparing mastectomies. Overall, no local or systemic recurrence was observed at a median follow-up of 27 months. Ten out of 34 (29.4 %) mastectomy specimens showed NAC involvement on pathology. By comparing patients with NAC preserved to patients with NAC removed, no significant preoperative predictors were identified.
conclusionBreast carcinoma patients who present with nipple discharge usually have early-stage cancer. Presence of nipple discharge is not equivalent to NAC involvement. Nipple preservation can be oncologically safe if negative margins are ascertained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.