Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27501521›Full record

ArticleFEBS letters2016

Analysis of biophysical and functional consequences of tropomyosin-fluorescent protein fusions.

Holly R Brooker, Michael A Geeves, Daniel P Mulvihill

Open access · hybridAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Holly R BrookerSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Michael A GeevesSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Daniel P MulvihillSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK. d.p.mulvihill@kent.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2502-5274
University of Kent · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K012045/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamic nature of actin polymers is modulated to facilitate a diverse range of cellular processes. These dynamic properties are determined by different isoforms of tropomyosin which are recruited to distinct subpopulations of actin polymers to differentially regulate their functional properties. This makes tropomyosin an attractive target for labelling discrete actin populations. We have assessed the effect of different fluorescent labelling strategies for this protein. Although tropomyosin-fluorescent fusions decorate actin in vivo, they are either nonfunctional or perturb regulation of actin nucleation and cell cycle timings. Thus, conclusions and physiological relevance should be carefully evaluated when using tropomyosin fusions.

Indexed as

ActinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsMolecular ImagingProtein BindingRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTropomyosinActinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsTropomyosinacetylationactin cytoskeletonCdc8fission yeastSchizosaccharomyces pombe

Identifiers

PMID27501521
PMCPMC5053231
OpenAlexW2507377471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.