ArticleCognition2016
Naming influences 9-month-olds' identification of discrete categories along a perceptual continuum.
Article in Cognition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking the Origins of Cross-Language Effects: How Heard Verbs Influence Japanese- and English-Speaking Children's Attention to the Details of Actions.Developmental science · 2026Article
- The nature of label-induced categories: preverbal infants represent surface features and category symbols.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- A principled link between object naming and representation is available to infants by seven months of age.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Sparse labels, no problems: Infant categorization under challenging conditions.Child development · 2022Article
- Human Perception as a Phenomenon of Quantization.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- From social contingency to verbal reference: A constructivist hypothesis.Psychological review · 2022Review
- Language level predicts perceptual categorization of complex reversible events in children.Heliyon · 2022Article
- How do the object-file and physical-reasoning systems interact? Evidence from priming effects with object arrays or novel labels.Cognitive psychology · 2021Article
- Infant categorization as a dynamic process linked to memory.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Emotion words, emotion concepts, and emotional development in children: A constructionist hypothesis.Developmental psychology · 2019Article
- Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2019Article
- A little labeling goes a long way: Semi-supervised learning in infancy.Developmental science · 2019Article
- Linking Language and Cognition in Infancy.Annual review of psychology · 2018Review
- Effects of Linguistic Labels on Visual Attention in Children and Young Adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- The Origins of Social Categorization.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2017Review
- 14- to 16-Month-Olds Attend to Distinct Labels in an Inductive Reasoning Task.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A growing body of evidence documents that naming guides 9-month-old infants as they organize their visual experiences into categories. In particular, this evidence reveals that naming highlights categories when these are visually distinct. Here we advance this work in by introducing an anticipatory looking design to assess how naming influences infants' categorization of objects that vary along a perceptual continuum. We introduced 9-month-old infants (n = 48) to continua of novel creature-like objects. During the learning phase, infants had an opportunity to observe that objects from one end of the perceptual continuum moved to the left and objects from the other end moved to the right. What varied was how the objects were named. Infants in theone-name condition heard the same novel noun applied to all objects along the continuum; those in the two-name condition heard one name for objects from one end of the continuum and a second name for objects at the other end. At test, all infants viewed new objects from the same continuum. At issue was whether infants would anticipate the side to which the test objects would move and whether their expectations varied as a function of naming condition. Infants in the one-name condition formed a single overarching category and therefore searched for new test objects at either location; those in the two-name condition discerned two categories and therefore correctly anticipated the likely location of the test objects, whether these were close to the poles or to the center of the continuum. This provides the first evidence that by 9 months, naming supports both the number of categories infants impose along a perceptual continuum and the clarity of the category boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.