Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27501156›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2016

Genetics of human origin and evolution: high-altitude adaptations.

Abigail W Bigham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the genetic footprints of high altitude adapted humans and livestock.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chasing genes at high-altitude.Experimental physiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Hypoxia as a medicine.Science translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abigail W BighamDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: awbigham@umich.edu.

Funding

High Altitude Adaptation: A Model for Chronic HypoxiaR33HL120751 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEE, FRANK S · 2016 to 2018
$1.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High altitude, defined as elevations lying above 2500m sea level, challenges human survival and reproduction. This environment provides a natural experimental design wherein specific populations, Andeans, Ethiopians, and Tibetans, have lived in a chronic hypoxia state for millennia. These human groups have overcome the low ambient oxygen tension of high elevation via unique physiologic and genetic adaptations. Genomic studies have identified several genes that underlie high-altitude adaptive phenotypes, many of which are central components of the Hypoxia Inducible Factor (HIF) pathway. Further study of mechanisms governing the adaptive changes responsible for high-altitude adaptation will contribute to our understanding of the molecular basis of evolutionary change and assist in the functional annotation of the human genome.

Indexed as

GenomicsSelection, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAltitudeGenome, HumanHumansHypoxiaPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID27501156
PMCPMC5161537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.