Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27501074›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2016

Purification of Native Complexes for Structural Study Using a Tandem Affinity Tag Method.

Clarisse van der Feltz, Daniel Pomeranz Krummel

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clarisse van der FeltzDepartment of Biochemistry, Brandeis University.
Daniel Pomeranz KrummelDepartment of Biochemistry, Brandeis University; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine; dapk@brandeis.edu.

Funding

Single particle reconstructionP01GM062580 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARRISON, STEPHEN COPLAN · 2001 to 2016
$23.7M
Quantitative Biology: a Graduate Curriculum Linking the Physical and Biomedical ST32EB009419 · NIBIB · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GELLES, JEFF, KONDEV, JANE · 2009 to 2018
$2.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009419NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM062580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affinity purification approaches have been successful in isolating native complexes for proteomic characterization. Structural heterogeneity and a degree of compositional heterogeneity of a complex do not usually impede progress in conducting such studies. In contrast, a complex intended for structural characterization should be purified in a state that is both compositionally and structurally homogeneous as well as at a higher concentration than required for proteomics. Recently, there have been significant advances in the application of electron microscopy for structure determination of large macromolecular complexes. This has heightened interest in approaches to purify native complexes of sufficient quality and quantity for structural determination by electron microscopy. The Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP) method has been optimized to extract and purify an 18-subunit, ~ 0.8 MDa ribonucleoprotein assembly from budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) suitable for negative stain and electron cryo microscopy. Herein is detailed the modifications made to the TAP method, the rationale for making these changes, and the approaches taken to assay for a compositionally and structurally homogeneous complex.

Indexed as

Chromatography, AffinityCryoelectron MicroscopyProteomicsRibonucleoproteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsRibonucleoproteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27501074
PMCPMC5091696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.