Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27500959›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2016

Cost of microbial larviciding for malaria control in rural Tanzania.

Rifat Rahman, Adriane Lesser, Leonard Mboera, Randall Kramer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Malaria Control Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Laboratory and semi-field evaluation of the efficacy ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rifat RahmanDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. rifatsrahman@gmail.com.
Adriane LesserDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Leonard MboeraNational Institute for Medical Research, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Randall KramerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Implementation Science to Optimize Malaria Vector Control and Disease ManagementR01AI088009 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KRAMER, RANDALL A · 2010 to 2013
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI088009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMicrobial larviciding may be a potential supplement to conventional malaria vector control measures, but scant information on its relative implementation costs and effectiveness, especially in rural areas, is an impediment to expanding its uptake. We perform a costing analysis of a seasonal microbial larviciding programme in rural Tanzania.

methodsWe evaluated the financial and economic costs from the perspective of the public provider of a 3-month, community-based larviciding intervention implemented in twelve villages in the Mvomero District of Tanzania in 2012-2013. Cost data were collected from financial reports and invoices and through discussion with programme administrators. Sensitivity analysis explored the robustness of our results to varying key parameters.

resultsOver the 2-year study period, approximately 6873 breeding sites were treated with larvicide. The average annual economic costs of the larviciding intervention in rural Tanzania are estimated at 2014 US$ 1.44 per person protected per year (pppy), US$ 6.18 per household and US$ 4481.88 per village, with the larvicide and staffing accounting for 14% and 58% of total costs, respectively.

conclusionsWe found the costs pppy of implementing a seasonal larviciding programme in rural Tanzania to be comparable to the costs of other larviciding programmes in urban Tanzania and rural Kenya. Further research should evaluate the cost-effectiveness of larviciding relative to, and in combination with, other vector control strategies in rural settings.

Indexed as

AnimalsCulicidaeHumansInsecticidesLarvaMalariaMosquito ControlRural PopulationTanzaniaInsecticidescontrol vectorialcostescostscoûtslarvicidas microbianoslarvicides microbienslutte antivectoriellemalariamicrobial larvicidingpaludismeTanzaniaTanzanievector control

Identifiers

PMID27500959
PMCPMC5093077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.