ReviewBone marrow transplantation2017
Sixty as the new forty: considerations on older related stem cell donors.
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoupling blood telomere length from age in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant in the BMT-CTN 1202.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Prostaglandin EStem cell reviews and reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Relationship of donor age and relationship to outcomes of haploidentical transplantation with posttransplant cyclophosphamide.Blood advances · 2021Article
- Modeling and Bioinformatics Identify Responders to G-CSF in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Development of an Unrelated Donor Selection Score Predictive of Survival after HCT: Donor Age Matters Most.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2018Article
- T Cell Depletion as an Alternative Approach for Patients 55 Years or Older Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation as Curative Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The era of reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation, with its emphasis on older patients, has created new challenges in the management of what is now an older related stem cell donor population. These donors are now on average no less than 10 years older than in the mid-1990s. Donors over 70 years of age are no longer isolated or exceptional cases. They may still be considered eligible for donation but many of them, based on the older age and their medical history, may no longer fully qualify as 'healthy' or 'normal'. The older the donor, the more likely that hematologic abnormalities, comorbidities and treated malignancies will complicate the picture. Assessing the risk-benefit ratio for both donor and recipient can now be more challenging than ever.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27500950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.