Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27500713›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes technology & therapeutics2016

Improved Insulin Pharmacokinetics Using a Novel Microneedle Device for Intradermal Delivery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Efrat Kochba, Yotam Levin, Itamar Raz, Avivit Cahn

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Needle Technology for Insulin Administration: A Century of Innovation.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Trends in peptide drug discovery.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Stimuli-Responsive Insulin Delivery Devices.Pharmaceutical research · 2020
    Review
  17. Advances in transdermal insulin delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2019
    Review
  18. Insulin (Technique) Induced Hypoglycaemia.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Efrat Kochba1 NanoPass Technologies Ltd. , Nes Ziona, Israel .
Yotam Levin1 NanoPass Technologies Ltd. , Nes Ziona, Israel .
Itamar Raz2 Diabetes Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization , Jerusalem, Israel .
Avivit Cahn2 Diabetes Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization , Jerusalem, Israel .
Hadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently available short-acting insulin analogs have slower absorption compared with endogenous insulin occasionally resulting in immediate postprandial hyperglycemia. Intradermal (ID) injection facilitates faster drug absorption and may result in improved insulin pharmacokinetics.

methodsSeventeen patients with type 2 diabetes were included in this single-center, pilot, open-label crossover study. Patients received 0.2 U/kg Insulin aspart ID injections using a MicronJet (MJ) needle and subcutaneous (SC) injections, using a conventional needle in a crossover design. Thirteen patients were studied under fasting conditions and four before a standard meal test. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile, as well as the safety and tolerability of injections, was compared.

resultsFourteen patients completed the study per-protocol. ID versus SC injection demonstrated significantly shorter Tmax (median 35 vs. 87.5 min [P < 0.001]), while the Cmax did not significantly differ (median 80 vs. 55 μU/mL [P = 0.085]). Median insulin area under the curve (AUC; 360 min) did not differ between the groups (9914 vs. 10,936 μU/mL/min [p = 0.077]), yet 0-60 min insulin AUC was higher with ID versus SC injection (mean ± SD 3821 ± 1429 vs. 2534 ± 737 μU/mL/min [p = 0.01]) and 4-6 h AUC was lower with ID versus SC injection (mean ± SD 2054 ± 858 vs. 2929 ± 1412 μU/mL/min [p = 0.02]). The relative bioavailability of the ID versus the SC insulin (AUCID/AUCSC) was similar (median 0.91 [95% confidence interval 0.73-1.27]).

conclusionsID insulin injection delivered through an MJ needle demonstrated superior PK profile compared with conventional SC administration, including shorter Tmax and higher early and lower late exposure in patients with type 2 diabetes. This may help achieve better insulin coverage of meals and lower postprandial glucose excursions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Over StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInjections, IntradermalInsulin AspartMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin Aspart

Identifiers

PMID27500713
PMCPMC5035373
OpenAlexW2510731647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.