Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27500137›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2016

Omnivores Going Astray: A Review and New Synthesis of Abnormal Behavior in Pigs and Laying Hens.

Emma I Brunberg, T Bas Rodenburg, Lotta Rydhmer, Joergen B Kjaer, Per Jensen, Linda J Keeling

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
24.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dried Black Soldier Fly (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Relevance of state-behaviour feedbacks for animal welfare.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. State of the art in research on the gut-liver and gut-brain axis in poultry.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  17. Tranquillizing Effect ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Regulatory T Cell Modulation byFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Emma I BrunbergNORSØK - Norwegian Centre for Organic Agriculture, Tingvoll, Norway; NIBIO - Norwegian Institute for Bioeconomy Research, Tingvoll, Norway.
T Bas RodenburgBehavioural Ecology Group, Wageningen University , Wageningen , Netherlands.
Lotta RydhmerDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , Uppsala , Sweden.
Joergen B KjaerFederal Research Institute for Animal Health, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut , Celle , Germany.
Per JensenAVIAN Behaviour Genomics and Physiology Group, IFM Biology, Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden.
Linda J KeelingDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , Uppsala , Sweden.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DELinköping University · SENorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research · NOWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pigs and poultry are by far the most omnivorous of the domesticated farm animals and it is in their nature to be highly explorative. In the barren production environments, this motivation to explore can be expressed as abnormal oral manipulation directed toward pen mates. Tail biting (TB) in pigs and feather pecking (FP) in laying hens are examples of unwanted behaviors that are detrimental to the welfare of the animals. The aim of this review is to draw these two seemingly similar abnormalities together in a common framework, in order to seek underlying mechanisms and principles. Both TB and FP are affected by the physical and social environment, but not all individuals in a group express these behaviors and individual genetic and neurobiological characteristics play an important role. By synthesizing what is known about environmental and individual influences, we suggest a novel possible mechanism, common for pigs and poultry, involving the brain-gut-microbiota axis.

Indexed as

animal welfarefeather peckinggut–brain–microbiota axispoultryswinetail biting

Identifiers

PMID27500137
PMCPMC4956668
OpenAlexW2481104848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.