Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27500016›Full record

ArticleJournal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

The Kilogram and Measurements of Mass and Force.

Z J Jabbour, S L Yaniv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nanometer Positional Control using Magnetic Suspension for Vacuum-to-Air Mass Metrology.Journal of dynamic systems, measurement, and control · 2018
    Article
  4. Stress Analysis of Conical Contact Joints in the NIST 4.45 MN Deadweight Machine.Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review of Instrumented Indentation.Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
    Article
  7. Uncertainty in NIST Force Measurements.Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
    Article
  8. Vacuum Technology Considerations For Mass Metrology.Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Z J JabbourNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001.
S L YanivNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes the facilities, measurement capabilities, and ongoing research activities in the areas of mass and force at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The first section of the paper is devoted to mass metrology and starts with a brief historical perspective on the developments that led to the current definition of the kilogram. An overview of mass measurement procedures is given with a brief discussion of current research on alternative materials for mass standards and surface profiles of the U.S. national prototype kilograms. A brief outlook into the future possible redefinition of the unit of mass based on fundamental principles is included. The second part of this paper focuses on the unit of force and describes the realization of the unit, measurement procedures, uncertainty in the realized force, facilities, and current efforts aimed at the realization of small forces.

Indexed as

forcekilogrammassuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID27500016
PMCPMC4865288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.