Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27499921›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2016

Inflammatory response in serrated precursor lesions of the colon classified according to WHO entities, clinical parameters and phenotype-genotype correlation.

Tilman T Rau, Raja Atreya, Daniela Aust, Gustavo Baretton, Matthias Eck, Katharina Erlenbach-Wünsch, Arndt Hartmann, Alessandro Lugli, Robert Stöhr, Michael Vieth and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Impact of X-Ray Repair Cross-Complementary 1 (Journal of inflammation research · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Evolving pathologic concepts of serrated lesions of the colorectum.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tilman T RauInstitute of Pathology, University Bern, BernSwitzerland; Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany.
Raja AtreyaMedical Clinic 1, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen Germany.
Daniela AustInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Dresden Carl Gustav Carus Dresden Germany.
Gustavo BarettonInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Dresden Carl Gustav Carus Dresden Germany.
Matthias EckInstitute of Pathology, Hospital Aschaffenburg Aschaffenburg Germany.
Katharina Erlenbach-WünschInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen Germany.
Arndt HartmannInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen Germany.
Alessandro LugliInstitute of Pathology, University Bern, Bern Switzerland.
Robert StöhrInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen Germany.
Michael ViethInstitute of Pathology, Hospital Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany.
Anna M WirsingInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany; Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway.
Inti ZlobecInstitute of Pathology, University Bern, Bern Switzerland.
Tiemo KatzenbergerInstitute of Pathology, Hospital Aschaffenburg Aschaffenburg Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) and sessile serrated adenoma with dysplasia (SSA-D) are rare due to the low frequency of these lesions, which are well defined by the latest WHO classification. However, introducing new morphological criteria such as intra-epithelial lymphocytes (IELs) might facilitate colorectal polyp diagnoses. Additionally, the phenotype-genotype correlation needs to be updated as the terminology has repeatedly changed. This study analysed 516 polyps, consisting of 118 classical adenomas (CAD), 116 hyperplastic polyps (HPP), 179 SSAs, 41 SSA-Ds, and 62 TSAs. The lesions were analysed in relation to the patients' clinical parameters including gender, age, localisation, and size. The inflammatory background of the polyps was quantified and BRAF and KRAS mutations as well as MLH1 and CDKN2A promoter methylation were assessed. In multivariate analyses, an increase in IELs was an independent and robust new criterion for the diagnosis of SSA-D (p < 0.001). Superficial erosions and acute neutrophil granulocytes led to reactive changes potentially resembling dysplasia. KRAS and BRAF mutations were associated with CAD/TSA and HPP/SSA, respectively. However, almost half of TSAs had a BRAF mutation and were KRAS wild type. CDKN2A seems to precede MLH1 hyper-methylation within the serrated carcinogenesis model. The genotyping of WHO-based entities - and especially SSA - has sharpened in comparison to previously published data. TSAs can be sub-grouped according to their mutation status. Of note, the higher number of IELs in SSA-D reflects their close relationship to colorectal cancers with micro-satellite instability. Therefore, IELs might represent a new diagnostic tool for SSA-D.

Indexed as

BRAFintra‐epithelial lymphocytesKRASmicro‐satellite instabilitysessile serrated adenomasessile serrated adenoma with dysplasiatraditional serrated adenoma

Identifiers

PMID27499921
PMCPMC4907061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.