Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27499891›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2015

Aurora A is a prognostic marker for breast cancer arising in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Margret Aradottir, Sigridur T Reynisdottir, Olafur A Stefansson, Jon G Jonasson, Asgerdur Sverrisdottir, Laufey Tryggvadottir, Jorunn E Eyfjord, Sigridur K Bodvarsdottir

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genes · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The New Paradigm of Network Medicine to Analyze Breast Cancer Phenotypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Margret AradottirCancer Research Laboratory, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland.
Sigridur T ReynisdottirCancer Research Laboratory, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland.
Olafur A StefanssonCancer Research Laboratory, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland.
Jon G JonassonFaculty of MedicineSchool of Health Sciences, University of IcelandReykjavikIceland; Icelandic Cancer RegistryIcelandic Cancer SocietyReykjavikIceland; Department of PathologyNational University HospitalReykjavikIceland.
Asgerdur SverrisdottirDepartment of Medical Oncology National University Hospital Reykjavik Iceland.
Laufey TryggvadottirFaculty of MedicineSchool of Health Sciences, University of IcelandReykjavikIceland; Icelandic Cancer RegistryIcelandic Cancer SocietyReykjavikIceland.
Jorunn E EyfjordCancer Research Laboratory, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland.
Sigridur K BodvarsdottirCancer Research Laboratory, Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland.
University of Iceland · ISIcelandic Cancer Society · ISNational University Hospital of Iceland · ISRMIT University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overexpression of the Aurora A kinase has been shown to have prognostic value in breast cancer. Previously, we showed a significant association between AURKA gene amplification and BRCA2 mutation in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of Aurora A overexpression on breast cancer arising in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Aurora A expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on breast tumour tissue microarrays from 107 BRCA2 999del5 mutation carriers and 284 of sporadic origin. Prognostic value of Aurora A nuclear staining was estimated in relation to clinical markers and adjuvant treatment, using multivariate Cox's proportional hazards ratio regression model. BRCA2 wild-type allele loss was measured by TaqMan in BRCA2 mutated tumour samples. All statistical tests were two sided. Multivariate analysis of breast cancer-specific survival, including proliferative markers and treatment, indicated independent prognostic value of Aurora A nuclear staining for BRCA2 mutation carriers (hazards ratio = 7.06; 95% confidence interval = 1.23-40.6; p = 0.028). Poor breast cancer-specific survival of BRCA2 mutation carriers was found to be significantly associated with combined Aurora A nuclear expression and BRCA2 wild type allele loss in tumours (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated independent prognostic value of both positive Aurora A nuclear staining (hazards ratio = 10.09; 95% confidence interval = 1.19-85.4, p = 0.034) and BRCA2 wild type allele loss (hazards ratio = 9.63; 95% confidence interval = 1.81-51.0, p = 0.008) for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Aurora A nuclear expression was found to be a significant prognostic marker for BRCA2 mutation carriers, independent of clinical parameters and adjuvant treatment. Our conclusion is that treatment benefits for BRCA2 mutation carriers and sporadic breast cancer patients with Aurora A positive tumours may be enhanced by giving attention to Aurora A targeted treatment.

Indexed as

adjuvant treatmentAurora ABRCA2breast cancerprognosiswild type allele loss

Identifiers

PMID27499891
PMCPMC4858119
OpenAlexW1834496657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.