Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27499880›Full record

ReviewRegeneration (Oxford, England)2016

Planarian brain regeneration as a model system for developmental neurotoxicology.

Danielle Hagstrom, Olivier Cochet-Escartin, Eva-Maria S Collins

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Viability ofmicroPublication biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring the potential ofCurrent research in toxicology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle HagstromDivision of Biological Sciences University of California San Diego, La Jolla California 92093 USA.
Olivier Cochet-EscartinDepartment of Physics University of California San Diego, La Jolla California 92093 USA.
Eva-Maria S CollinsDivision of Biological Sciences University of California San Diego, La Jolla California 92093 USA; Department of Physics University of California San Diego, La Jolla California 92093 USA.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

GENETIC MECHANISMS AND REGULATIONT32GM007240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAMPTON, RANDOLPH Y. · 1985 to 2019
$23.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater planarians, famous for their regenerative prowess, have long been recognized as a valuable in vivo animal model to study the effects of chemical exposure. In this review, we summarize the current techniques and tools used in the literature to assess toxicity in the planarian system. We focus on the planarian's particular amenability for neurotoxicology and neuroregeneration studies, owing to the planarian's unique ability to regenerate a centralized nervous system. Zooming in from the organismal to the molecular level, we show that planarians offer a repertoire of morphological and behavioral readouts while also being amenable to mechanistic studies of compound toxicity. Finally, we discuss the open challenges and opportunities for planarian brain regeneration to become an important model system for modern toxicology.

Indexed as

Behaviorneurodevelopmentplanariansregenerationtoxicology

Identifiers

PMID27499880
PMCPMC4895328
OpenAlexW2280826051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.