Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27499872›Full record

ArticleRegeneration (Oxford, England)2015

Epidermal closure regulates histolysis during mammalian (Mus) digit regeneration.

Jennifer Simkin, Mimi C Sammarco, Lindsay A Dawson, Catherine Tucker, Louis J Taylor, Keith Van Meter, Ken Muneoka

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhancer-directed gene delivery for digit regeneration based on conserved epidermal factors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Extracellular matrix remodeling supportsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Aging: the wound that never starts healing.Nature communications · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Toeing the line between regeneration and fibrosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mouse Digit Tip Regeneration Is Mechanical Load Dependent.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer SimkinDivision of Developmental Biology, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology Tulane University New Orleans Louisiana 70118 USA; Department of Biology University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky 40506 USA.
Mimi C SammarcoDivision of Developmental Biology, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology Tulane University New Orleans Louisiana 70118 USA.
Lindsay A DawsonDivision of Developmental Biology, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology Tulane University New Orleans Louisiana 70118 USA; Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Texas A&M University College Station Texas 77843 USA.
Catherine TuckerDivision of Developmental Biology, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology Tulane University New Orleans Louisiana 70118 USA.
Louis J TaylorDivision of Developmental Biology, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology Tulane University New Orleans Louisiana 70118 USA.
Keith Van MeterDepartment of Medicine Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans Louisiana 70112 USA.
Ken MuneokaDivision of Developmental Biology, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology Tulane University New Orleans Louisiana 70118 USA; Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Texas A&M University College Station Texas 77843 USA.
Tulane University · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian digit regeneration progresses through consistent stages: histolysis, inflammation, epidermal closure, blastema formation, and finally redifferentiation. What we do not yet know is how each stage can affect others. Questions of stage timing, tissue interactions, and microenvironmental states are becoming increasingly important as we look toward solutions for whole limb regeneration. This study focuses on the timing of epidermal closure which, in mammals, is delayed compared to more regenerative animals like the axolotl. We use a standard wound closure device, Dermabond (2-octyl cyanoacrylate), to induce earlier epidermal closure, and we evaluate the effect of fast epidermal closure on histolysis, blastema formation, and redifferentiation. We find that fast epidermal closure is reliant upon a hypoxic microenvironment. Additionally, early epidermal closure eliminates the histolysis stage and results in a regenerate that more closely replicates the amputated structure. We show that tools like Dermabond and oxygen are able to independently influence the various stages of regeneration enabling us to uncouple histolysis, wound closure, and other regenerative events. With this study, we start to understand how each stage of mammalian digit regeneration is controlled.

Indexed as

Blastemadigithypoxiamouseregeneration

Identifiers

PMID27499872
PMCPMC4895321
OpenAlexW2022789026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.