Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27499840›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of cardiovascular medicine2016

Refining the Enrolment Process in Emergency Medicine Research.

Kate M Sahan, Keith M Channon, Robin P Choudhury, Rajesh K Kharbanda, Regent Lee, Mark Sheehan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of cardiovascular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Dynamic changes in injured myocardium, very early after acute myocardial infarction, quantified using T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kate M SahanThe Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, The Joint Research Office, Block 60, The Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington, OX3 7LE.
Keith M ChannonRadcliffe Department of Medicine University of Oxford, Level 6, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, The Joint Research Office, Block 60, The Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington, OX3 7LE.
Robin P ChoudhuryRadcliffe Department of Medicine University of Oxford, Level 6, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU; Oxford Acute Vascular Imaging Centre, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford.
Rajesh K KharbandaRadcliffe Department of Medicine University of Oxford, Level 6, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, The Joint Research Office, Block 60, The Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington, OX3 7LE.
Regent LeeNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, The Joint Research Office, Block 60, The Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington, OX3 7LE.
Mark SheehanThe Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, The Joint Research Office, Block 60, The Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington, OX3 7LE.

Funding

Department of Health IS-BRC-0211-10025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in the emergency setting involving patients with acute clinical conditions is needed if there are to be advances in diagnosis and treatment. But research in these areas poses ethical and practical challenges. One of these is the general inability to obtain informed consent due to the patient's lack of mental capacity and insufficient time to contact legal representatives. Regulatory frameworks which allow this research to proceed with a consent 'waiver', provided patients lack mental capacity, miss important ethical subtleties. One of these is the varying nature of mental capacity among emergency medicine patients. Not only is their capacity variable and often unclear, but some patients are also likely to be able to engage with the researcher and the context to varying degrees. In this paper we describe the key elements of a novel enrolment process for emergency medicine research that refines the consent waiver and fully engages with the ethical rationale for consent and, in this context, its waiver. The process is verbal but independently documented during the 'emergent' stages of the research. It provides appropriate engagement with the patient, is context-sensitive and better addresses ethical subtleties. In line with regulation, full written consent for on-going participation in the research is obtained once the emergency is passed.

Indexed as

assentconsent waiveremergency medicine researchinformed consentmental capacity

Identifiers

PMID27499840
PMCPMC4975512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.