Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27499812›Full record

ArticleEuropean cardiology2016

Cardiac Repair and Regeneration: The Value of Cell Therapies.

Daniel Alejandro Lerman, Nasri Alotti, Kiddy Levente Ume, Bruno Péault

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CD160Cellular & molecular immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Intramyocardial immunomodulation with human CD16Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Tendon and Ligament Healing and Current Approaches to Tendon and Ligament Regeneration.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Review
  11. Adult sox10Cell reports · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. New Treatment Strategies for Alcohol-Induced Heart Damage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel Alejandro LermanDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Infirmary Hospital of Edinburgh (NHS Lothian), University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK; MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine and College of Medicine and Veterinary, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Nasri AlottiZala County Hospital, Pécs University, Hungary.
Kiddy Levente UmeUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Bruno PéaultMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine and College of Medicine and Veterinary, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Orthopaedic Hospital Research Centre, University of California at Los Angeles, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation RM/13/2/30158Medical Research Council G1000816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischaemic heart disease is the predominant contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; one million myocardial Infarctions occur per year in the USA, while more than five million patients suffer from chronic heart failure. Recently, heart failure has been singled out as an epidemic and is a staggering clinical and public health problem associated with significant mortality, morbidity and healthcare expenditures, particularly among those aged ≥65 years. Death rates have improved dramatically over the last four decades, but new approaches are nevertheless urgently needed for those patients who go on to develop ventricular dysfunction and chronic heart failure. Over the past decade, stem cell transplantation has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for acute or chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Multiple candidate cell types have been used in preclinical animal models and in humans to repair or regenerate the injured heart, either directly or indirectly (through paracrine effects), including: embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), neonatal cardiomyocytes, skeletal myoblasts (SKMs), endothelial progenitor cells, bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and, most recently, cardiac stem cells (CSCs). Although no consensus has emerged yet, the ideal cell type for the treatment of heart disease should: (a) improve heart function; (b) create healthy and functional cardiac muscle and vasculature, integrated into the host tissue; (c) be amenable to delivery by minimally invasive clinical methods; (d) be available 'off the shelf' as a standardised reagent; (e) be tolerated by the immune system; (f) be safe oncologically, i.e. not create tumours; and (g) circumvent societal ethical concerns. At present, it is not clear whether such a 'perfect' stem cell exists; what is apparent, however, is that some cell types are more promising than others. In this brief review, we provide ongoing data on agreement and controversy arising from clinical trials and touch upon the future directions of cell therapy for heart disease.

Indexed as

Acute myocardial infarctionbone marrow stem cellscardiac regenerationcardiac repaircardiac stem cellscardiac stem/progenitor cellsembryonic stem cellsischaemic cardiomyopathymesenchymal stem cellspericytesskeletal myoblasts

Identifiers

PMID27499812
PMCPMC4973885
OpenAlexW2346165911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.