Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27499810›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2016

Exploring xylose metabolism in Spathaspora species: XYL1.2 from Spathaspora passalidarum as the key for efficient anaerobic xylose fermentation in metabolic engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Raquel M Cadete, Alejandro M de Las Heras, Anders G Sandström, Carla Ferreira, Francisco Gírio, Marie-Françoise Gorwa-Grauslund, Carlos A Rosa, César Fonseca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Machine learning enables identification of an alternative yeast galactose utilization pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. FromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Current Ethanol Production Requirements for the YeastInternational journal of microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. D-Xylose Sensing inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. EngineeredBioengineered · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Raquel M CadeteDepartamento de Microbiologia, ICB, C.P. 486, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901 Brazil ; Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, I.P., Unidade de Bioenergia, Estrada do Paço do Lumiar 22, 1649-038 Lisbon, Portugal ; Department of Applied Microbiology, Lund University, PO Box 124, 22100 Lund, Sweden.
Alejandro M de Las HerasDepartment of Applied Microbiology, Lund University, PO Box 124, 22100 Lund, Sweden.
Anders G SandströmDepartment of Applied Microbiology, Lund University, PO Box 124, 22100 Lund, Sweden ; Novozymes A/S, Krogshøjvej 36, 2880 Bagsværd, Denmark.
Carla FerreiraLaboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, I.P., Unidade de Bioenergia, Estrada do Paço do Lumiar 22, 1649-038 Lisbon, Portugal.
Francisco GírioLaboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, I.P., Unidade de Bioenergia, Estrada do Paço do Lumiar 22, 1649-038 Lisbon, Portugal.
Marie-Françoise Gorwa-GrauslundDepartment of Applied Microbiology, Lund University, PO Box 124, 22100 Lund, Sweden.
Carlos A RosaDepartamento de Microbiologia, ICB, C.P. 486, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901 Brazil.
César FonsecaLaboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia, I.P., Unidade de Bioenergia, Estrada do Paço do Lumiar 22, 1649-038 Lisbon, Portugal ; Section for Sustainable Biotechnology, Aalborg University Copenhagen, A. C. Meyers Vænge 15, 2450 Copenhagen SV, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2448-7063
National Laboratory of Energy and Geology · PTLund University · SEUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRNovozymes (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe production of ethanol and other fuels and chemicals from lignocellulosic materials is dependent of efficient xylose conversion. Xylose fermentation capacity in yeasts is usually linked to xylose reductase (XR) accepting NADH as cofactor. The XR from Scheffersomyces stipitis, which is able to use NADH as cofactor but still prefers NADPH, has been used to generate recombinant xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Novel xylose-fermenting yeasts species, as those from the Spathaspora clade, have been described and are potential sources of novel genes to improve xylose fermentation in S. cerevisiae.

resultsXylose fermentation by six strains from different Spathaspora species isolated in Brazil, plus the Sp. passalidarum type strain (CBS 10155(T)), was characterized under two oxygen-limited conditions. The best xylose-fermenting strains belong to the Sp. passalidarum species, and their highest ethanol titers, yields, and productivities were correlated to higher XR activity with NADH than with NADPH. Among the different Spathaspora species, Sp. passalidarum appears to be the sole harboring two XYL1 genes: XYL1.1, similar to the XYL1 found in other Spathaspora and yeast species and XYL1.2, with relatively higher expression level. XYL1.1p and XYL1.2p from Sp. passalidarum were expressed in S. cerevisiae TMB 3044 and XYL1.1p was confirmed to be strictly NADPH-dependent, while XYL1.2p to use both NADPH and NADH, with higher activity with the later. Recombinant S. cerevisiae strains expressing XYL1.1p did not show anaerobic growth in xylose medium. Under anaerobic xylose fermentation, S. cerevisiae TMB 3504, which expresses XYL1.2p from Sp. passalidarum, revealed significant higher ethanol yield and productivity than S. cerevisiae TMB 3422, which harbors XYL1p N272D from Sc. stipitis in the same isogenic background (0.40 vs 0.34 g gCDW (-1) and 0.33 vs 0.18 g gCDW (-1) h(-1), respectively).

conclusionThis work explored a new clade of xylose-fermenting yeasts (Spathaspora species) towards the engineering of S. cerevisiae for improved xylose fermentation. The new S. cerevisiae TMB 3504 displays higher XR activity with NADH than with NADPH, with consequent improved ethanol yield and productivity and low xylitol production. This meaningful advance in anaerobic xylose fermentation by recombinant S. cerevisiae (using the XR/XDH pathway) paves the way for the development of novel industrial pentose-fermenting strains.

Indexed as

BioethanolNADH-preferring xylose reductaseSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpathaspora passalidarumSpathaspora speciesXYL1.2Xylose fermentation

Identifiers

PMID27499810
PMCPMC4974763
OpenAlexW2485379417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.