ArticleFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience2016
Control of Transmembrane Protein Diffusion within the Postsynaptic Density Assessed by Simultaneous Single-Molecule Tracking and Localization Microscopy.
Article in Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential nanoscale organization of excitatory synapses onto excitatory vs. inhibitory neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Differential nanoscale organization of excitatory synapses onto excitatory vs inhibitory neurons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Subsynaptic mobility of presynaptic mGluR types is differentially regulated by intra- and extracellular interactions.Molecular biology of the cell · 2022Article
- Imaging the endocannabinoid signaling system.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2022Review
- Lack of support for surface diffusion of postsynaptic AMPARs in tuning synaptic transmission.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Contribution of Membrane Lipids to Postsynaptic Protein Organization.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2021Review
- Light Sheet Illumination for 3D Single-Molecule Super-Resolution Imaging of Neuronal Synapses.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2021Review
- Quantitative Synaptic Biology: A Perspective on Techniques, Numbers and Expectations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- ORANGE: A CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing toolbox for epitope tagging of endogenous proteins in neurons.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Functional organization of postsynaptic glutamate receptors.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2018Review
- Subsynaptic spatial organization as a regulator of synaptic strength and plasticity.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2018Review
- The Axon Initial Segment: An Updated Viewpoint.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Review
- Self-crowding of AMPA receptors in the excitatory postsynaptic density can effectuate anomalous receptor sub-diffusion.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- A Revised View on the Role of Surface AMPAR Mobility in Tuning Synaptic Transmission: Limitations, Tools, and Alternative Views.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2018Review
- Transcellular Nanoalignment of Synaptic Function.Neuron · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Postsynaptic transmembrane proteins are critical elements of synapses, mediating trans-cellular contact, sensitivity to neurotransmitters and other signaling molecules, and flux of Ca and other ions. Positioning and mobility of each member of this large class of proteins is critical to their individual function at the synapse. One critical example is that the position of glutamate receptors within the postsynaptic density (PSD) strongly modulates their function by aligning or misaligning them with sites of presynaptic vesicle fusion. In addition, the regulated ability of receptors to move in or out of the synapse is critical for activity-dependent plasticity. However, factors that control receptor mobility within the boundaries of the synapse are not well understood. Notably, PSD scaffold molecules accumulate in domains much smaller than the synapse. Within these nanodomains, the density of proteins is considerably higher than that of the synapse as a whole, so high that steric hindrance is expected to reduce receptor mobility substantially. However, while numerical modeling has demonstrated several features of how the varying protein density across the face of a single PSD may modulate receptor motion, there is little experimental information about the extent of this influence. To address this critical aspect of synaptic organizational dynamics, we performed single-molecule tracking of transmembrane proteins using universal point accumulation-for-imaging-in-nanoscale-topography (uPAINT) over PSDs whose internal structure was simultaneously resolved using photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM). The results provide important experimental confirmation that PSD scaffold protein density strongly influences the mobility of transmembrane proteins. A protein with a cytosolic domain that does not bind PSD-95 was still slowed in regions of high PSD-95 density, suggesting that crowding by scaffold molecules and perhaps other proteins is sufficient to stabilize receptors even in the absence of binding. Because numerous proteins thought to be involved in establishing PSD structure are linked to disorders including autism and depression, this motivates further exploration of how PSD nanostructure is created. The combined application PALM and uPAINT should be invaluable for distinguishing the interactions of mobile proteins with their nano-environment both in synapses and other cellular compartments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.