Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27499685›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2016

Bioinformatics Approach in Plant Genomic Research.

Quang Ong, Phuc Nguyen, Nguyen Phuong Thao, Ly Le

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quang OngPlant Abiotic Stress Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; ; Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;
Phuc NguyenSchool of Biotechnology, International University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Phuong ThaoSchool of Biotechnology, International University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Ly LeSchool of Biotechnology, International University, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City · VNTon Duc Thang University · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advance in genomics technology leads to the dramatic change in plant biology research. Plant biologists now easily access to enormous genomic data to deeply study plant high-density genetic variation at molecular level. Therefore, fully understanding and well manipulating bioinformatics tools to manage and analyze these data are essential in current plant genome research. Many plant genome databases have been established and continued expanding recently. Meanwhile, analytical methods based on bioinformatics are also well developed in many aspects of plant genomic research including comparative genomic analysis, phylogenomics and evolutionary analysis, and genome-wide association study. However, constantly upgrading in computational infrastructures, such as high capacity data storage and high performing analysis software, is the real challenge for plant genome research. This review paper focuses on challenges and opportunities which knowledge and skills in bioinformatics can bring to plant scientists in present plant genomics era as well as future aspects in critical need for effective tools to facilitate the translation of knowledge from new sequencing data to enhancement of plant productivity.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsComparative genomicsGWASNext-generation sequencingPhylogenomicsPlant genomics

Identifiers

PMID27499685
PMCPMC4955030
OpenAlexW2443746843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.