ArticlePatient preference and adherence2016
Sex differences in the quality of life of patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention after a 3-year follow-up.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of health-related quality of life among patients with Ischemic heart disease.Health systems (Basingstoke, England) · 2024Article
- Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Clinics and practice · 2023Article
- Sex differences in quality of life of patients following percutaneous coronary intervention in Vietnam.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Factors related to health-related quality of life in patients with acute coronary syndrome in West Java, Indonesia: A correlational study.Belitung nursing journal · 2022Article
- How gender-specific are predictors of post-MI HRQoL? A longitudinal study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Article
- Quality of Life and Frailty Syndrome in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.Clinical interventions in aging · 2020Observational
- Does sex predict quality of life after acute coronary syndromes: an Australian, state-wide, multicentre prospective cohort study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- The use of echocardiographic and clinical data recorded on admission to simplify decision making for elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aims of this study were to analyze the dynamics of quality of life (QoL) changes after 36 months from the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) depending on sex and identify baseline predictors of the follow-up QoL of patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and subjected to PCI. METHODS AND
resultsThe study included 137 patients, females (n=67) and males (n=70), with ACS who underwent PCI. The QoL was assessed using the MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire. The group of females scored lower in all the domains of the MacNew Heart Disease Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire in the initial measurement (B 1), in the measurement after 6 months (B 2), and in the long-term follow-up measurement (36 months - B 3). Despite the fact that both groups achieved improved QoL, its values were higher in the males. The average growth rate of the QoL score in the period from the sixth month to 36th month was higher in females than in males. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, significant independent predictors with a negative influence on the long-term QoL score included female sex (ρ=-0.190, β=-0.21), age >60 years (ρ=-0.255, β=-0.186), and diabetes (ρ=-0.216, β=-0.216).
conclusionIn a 36-month follow-up of ACS patients treated with PCI, there were no statistically significant differences in QoL between sexes. In the entire cohort, there was improvement in QoL, which was higher in the case of the females studied. For the entire group, significant independent determinants of lower QoL 3 years after ACS included female sex, age >60 years, and diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.