Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27499140›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2016

Anti-CD44 antibodies inhibit both mTORC1 and mTORC2: a new rationale supporting CD44-induced AML differentiation therapy.

S Z Gadhoum, N Y Madhoun, A F Abuelela, J S Merzaban

Open access · bronzeAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Encoding Cell-Surface Receptor Function Through Glycosylation: Lessons From CD44.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Therapeutic Targeting of the Leukaemia Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Leukemic stem cells: identification and clinical application.International journal of hematology · 2017
    Review
  15. Mass Cytometry Identifies Distinct Lung CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S Z GadhoumBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
N Y MadhounBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
A F AbuelelaBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
J S MerzabanBiological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorForkhead Box Protein O3HumansHyaluronan ReceptorsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktAntibodies, MonoclonalCD44 protein, humanForkhead Box Protein O3FOXO3 protein, humanHyaluronan ReceptorsMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt

Identifiers

PMID27499140
PMCPMC5155032
OpenAlexW2509663556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.