Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27498963›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Smartphone-enabled optofluidic exosome diagnostic for concussion recovery.

Jina Ko, Matthew A Hemphill, David Gabrieli, Leon Wu, Venkata Yelleswarapu, Gladys Lawrence, Wesley Pennycooke, Anup Singh, Dave F Meaney, David Issadore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Recent developments in biosensing methods for extracellular vesicle protein characterization.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  11. Isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles and future directions in diagnosis and therapy.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jina KoDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Matthew A HemphillDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
David GabrieliDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Leon WuDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Venkata YelleswarapuDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Gladys LawrenceDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Wesley PennycookeDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Anup SinghDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Dave F MeaneyDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
David IssadoreDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

Nanomagnetic isolation and sensing for mobile HIV-1 self-testingR61AI147406 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ISSADORE, DAVID AARON · 2019 to 2021
$1.4M
Mechanisms of remodeling circuit connectivity after traumatic brain injuryR01NS088176 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEANEY, DAVID F · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
A micro Hall chip for circulating microvesicle based cancer monitoringR21CA182336 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ISSADORE, DAVID AARON · 2014 to 2016
$664k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA182336NIAID NIH HHS R61 AI147406NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major impediment to improving the treatment of concussion is our current inability to identify patients that will experience persistent problems after the injury. Recently, brain-derived exosomes, which cross the blood-brain barrier and circulate following injury, have shown great potential as a noninvasive biomarker of brain recovery. However, clinical use of exosomes has been constrained by their small size (30-100 nm) and the extensive sample preparation (>24 hr) needed for traditional exosome measurements. To address these challenges, we developed a smartphone-enabled optofluidic platform to measure brain-derived exosomes. Sample-to-answer on our chip is 1 hour, 10x faster than conventional techniques. The key innovation is an optofluidic device that can detect enzyme amplified exosome biomarkers, and is read out using a smartphone camera. Using this approach, we detected and profiled GluR2+ exosomes in the post-injury state using both in vitro and murine models of concussion.

Indexed as

MicrofluidicsSmartphoneAnimalsBiological TransportBiomarkersBlood-Brain BarrierBrain ConcussionDisease Models, AnimalExosomesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsOptics and PhotonicsPrognosisRatsBiomarkersglutamate receptor ionotropic, AMPA 2Receptors, AMPA

Identifiers

PMID27498963
PMCPMC4976377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.