Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27498696›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

The suppression of scale-free fMRI brain dynamics across three different sources of effort: aging, task novelty and task difficulty.

Nathan W Churchill, Robyn Spring, Cheryl Grady, Bernadine Cimprich, Mary K Askren, Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz, Mi Sook Jung, Scott Peltier, Stephen C Strother, Marc G Berman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic contributions to brain criticality and its relationship with human cognitive functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Temporal complexity of the BOLD-signal in preterm versus term infants.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  8. Aperiodic EEG Predicts Variability of Visual Temporal Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Temporal Dynamics of Brain Activity Predicting Sense of Agency over Muscle Movements.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. The fractal brain: scale-invariance in structure and dynamics.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nathan W ChurchillKeenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Robyn SpringRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, 3560 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON, M6A 2E1, Canada.
Cheryl GradyRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, 3560 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON, M6A 2E1, Canada.
Bernadine CimprichSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, 426 N Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.
Mary K AskrenDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, 400 N Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Patricia A Reuter-LorenzDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, 400 N Ingalls St, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Mi Sook JungCollege of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Jung-gu, Munhwa-ro 266, Daejeon, 301-747, South Korea.
Scott PeltierBiomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2200 Bonisteel Blvd, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Stephen C StrotherRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Hospital, 3560 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON, M6A 2E1, Canada.
Marc G BermanDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 S University Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence that fluctuations in brain activity may exhibit scale-free ("fractal") dynamics. Scale-free signals follow a spectral-power curve of the form P(f ) ∝ f(-β), where spectral power decreases in a power-law fashion with increasing frequency. In this study, we demonstrated that fractal scaling of BOLD fMRI signal is consistently suppressed for different sources of cognitive effort. Decreases in the Hurst exponent (H), which quantifies scale-free signal, was related to three different sources of cognitive effort/task engagement: 1) task difficulty, 2) task novelty, and 3) aging effects. These results were consistently observed across multiple datasets and task paradigms. We also demonstrated that estimates of H are robust across a range of time-window sizes. H was also compared to alternative metrics of BOLD variability (SDBOLD) and global connectivity (Gconn), with effort-related decreases in H producing similar decreases in SDBOLD and Gconn. These results indicate a potential global brain phenomenon that unites research from different fields and indicates that fractal scaling may be a highly sensitive metric for indexing cognitive effort/task engagement.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27498696
PMCPMC4976369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.