Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27498355›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2016

Safety and patient response as indicated by biomarker changes to binding immunoglobulin protein in the phase I/IIA RAGULA clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis.

Bruce Kirkham, Khaldoun Chaabo, Christopher Hall, Toby Garrood, Timothy Mant, Elizabeth Allen, Alexandra Vincent, Joana C Vasconcelos, Andrew T Prevost, Gabriel S Panayi and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Heat Shock Proteins Alterations in Rheumatoid Arthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruce KirkhamDepartment of Rheumatology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Hospital.
Khaldoun ChaaboDepartment of Rheumatology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Hospital.
Christopher HallAcademic Department of Rheumatology, Centre for Molecular and Cellular Biology of Inflammation, King's College London.
Toby GarroodDepartment of Rheumatology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Hospital.
Timothy MantQuintiles Clinical Trials Unit.
Elizabeth AllenQuintiles Clinical Trials Unit.
Alexandra VincentDepartment of Rheumatology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Hospital.
Joana C VasconcelosDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Andrew T PrevostDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Gabriel S PanayiDepartment of Rheumatology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust Hospital gabriel.panayi@kcl.ac.uk.
Valerie M CorrigallAcademic Department of Rheumatology, Centre for Molecular and Cellular Biology of Inflammation, King's College London.
King's College London · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBIQVIA (United Kingdom) · GBThomas Foundation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBinding immunoglobulin protein (BiP) is a human endoplasmic reticulum-resident stress protein. In pre-clinical studies it has anti-inflammatory properties due to the induction of regulatory cells. This randomized placebo-controlled, dose ascending double blind phase I/IIA trial of BiP in patients with active RA, who had failed accepted therapies, had the primary objective of safety. Potential efficacy was measured by DAS28-ESR and changes in biomarkers.

methodsTwenty-four patients with active RA who had failed one or more DMARDs were sequentially assigned to three groups each of eight patients randomly allocated to receive placebo (two patients) or BiP (six patients), 1, 5 or 15 mg. Patients received a single i.v. infusion over 1 h and were observed as inpatients overnight. A 12-week follow-up for clinical, rheumatological and laboratory assessments for safety, efficacy (DAS28-ESR) and biomarker analysis was performed.

resultsNo infusion reactions or serious adverse drug reactions were noted. Adverse events were evenly distributed between placebo and BiP groups with no BiP-related toxicities. Haematological, renal and metabolic parameters showed no drug-related toxicities. Remission was only achieved by patients in the 5 and 15 mg groups, and not patients who received placebo or 1 mg BiP. Good DAS28-ESR responses were achieved in all treatment groups. The BiP responding patients showed significantly lower serum concentrations of CRP, 2 weeks post-infusion compared with pre-infusion levels, and of VEGF and IL-8 from the placebo group.

conclusionBiP (⩽15 mg) is safe in patients with active RA. Some patients had clinical and biological improvements in RA activity. BiP merits further study.

trial registrationISRCTN registry, http://isrctn.com, ISRCTN22288225 and EudraCT, https://eudract.ema.europa.eu, 2011-005831-19.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsBiomarkersDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousInterleukin-8LymphokinesMaleMiddle AgedRecombinant ProteinsAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsBiomarkersimmunoglobulin-binding factorsInterleukin-8LymphokinesRecombinant ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ABiPchanges in biomarkersCRPefficacyfirst-in-human trialIL-8prolonged activityregulatory cellssafetyVEGF

Identifiers

PMID27498355
PMCPMC5854092
OpenAlexW2501052616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.