ArticleCryobiology2016
Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa with minimal non-permeable cryoprotectant.
Article in Cryobiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparison of simplified versus the original media in standard vapor freezing and in-house vitrification of human sperm.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2026Article
- Exploring the effect of skim milk on the membrane stability of frozen-thawed Inner Mongolia cashmere goat sperm based on proteomics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Trehalose in cryopreservation. Applications, mechanisms and intracellular delivery opportunities.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Evaluation of microRNA expression profiles in human sperm frozen using permeable cryoprotectant-free droplet vitrification and conventional methods.Asian journal of andrology · 2024Article
- Impact of cryoprotectant-free sperm vitrification in pulled-glass capillary on sperm parameters and DNA integrity: A lab trial study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024Article
- Article
- A comprehensive review and update on human fertility cryopreservation methods and tools.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Cryopreservation: A Review Article.Cureus · 2022Review
- Vapour fast freezing with low semen volumes can highly improve motility and viability or DNA quality of cryopreserved human spermatozoa.Andrology · 2022Article
- Hydrophobic soot nanoparticles as a non-cytotoxic motility activator of human spermatozoa.Nanoscale advances · 2022Article
- Article
- Characterizing modes of action and interaction for multicomponent osmolyte solutions on Jurkat cells.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2019Article
- Characterizing the "sweet spot" for the preservation of a T-cell line using osmolytes.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- A retrospective study on sperm banking: a Uruguayan experience.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2018Article
- Cryopreservation and its clinical applications.Integrative medicine research · 2017Review
- Studies on the basic issues relevant to sperm cryopreservation in humans.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa is a commonly used technique in assisted reproduction, however freezing low concentrations of sperm while maintaining adequate post-thaw motility remains a challenge. In an effort to optimize post-thaw motility yields, low volumes of human sperm were frozen in polyimide-coated fused silica micro-capillaries using 0.065 M, 0.125 M, 0.25 M, or 0.5 M trehalose as the only cryoprotectant. Micro-capillaries were either initially incubated in liquid nitrogen vapor before plunging into liquid nitrogen, or directly plunged into liquid nitrogen. Post thaw sperm counts and motility were estimated. Spermatozoa that were initially incubated in liquid nitrogen vapor had greater post thaw motility than those plunged immediately into liquid nitrogen independent of trehalose concentration. The protective effect of 0.125 M d-glucose, 3-O-methyl-d-glucopyranose, trehalose, sucrose, raffinose, or stachyose were evaluated individually. Trehalose and sucrose were the most effective cryoprotectants, recovering 69.0% and 68.9% of initial sperm motility, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.