Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27498136›Full record

ReviewFertility and sterility2016

Effects of bisphenol A on male and couple reproductive health: a review.

Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón, Russ Hauser, Audrey J Gaskins

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fertility and sterility, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00011713 (Human Exposure to Bisphenol A, Phthalates and Fertility, Pregnancy Outcomes.), which is not on this map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00011713 completednot on this map

Human Exposure to Bisphenol A, Phthalates and Fertility, Pregnancy Outcomes.

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)Ran1999 to 2020Enrolled1,474ConditionsInfertilityArmsCompletion questionnaires/providing biological samples
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Reprotoxic Impact of Environment, Diet, and Behavior.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  20. Oxidant-Sensitive Inflammatory Pathways and Male Reproductive Functions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lidia Mínguez-AlarcónDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Russ HauserDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: rhauser@hsph.harvard.edu.
Audrey J GaskinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

PCBs, Phthalates and Male Reproductive HealthR01ES009718 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI HAUSER, RUSS B · 1999 to 2018
$11.6M
NICHD NIH HHS L50 HD085359NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES009718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a ubiquitous environmental toxicant with endocrine-disrupting properties and is suspected to affect human reproduction. The objective of this review was to summarize the potential effects of male exposure to BPA on markers of testicular function and couple reproductive outcomes. Five epidemiologic studies on BPA and reproductive hormones all found significant associations with at least one reproductive hormone; however, no consistent relationships were observed across studies. Six epidemiologic studies evaluated the relation between BPA and semen parameters, and although the majority reported negative associations with various parameters, there were few consistent trends across studies. Finally, three epidemiologic studies examined BPA and couple reproductive outcomes, and only one found an association. Overall, the evidence supporting an association between BPA exposure and adverse male reproductive health outcomes in humans remains limited and inconclusive. Reasons for the discrepancies in results could include, but are not limited to, differences in study populations (e.g., fertile vs. subfertile men), BPA urinary concentrations (occupationally vs. nonoccupationally exposed), misclassification of BPA exposure (e.g., using one urine sample to characterize exposure vs. multiple samples), sample sizes, study design (e.g., cross-sectional vs. prospective), and residual confounding (e.g., due to diet and lifestyle factors). It is also possible that some of the statistically significant findings were due to chance alone. Clearly, further studies are needed to further clarify the role of this ubiquitous endocrine-disrupting chemical on male reproductive health.

Indexed as

Reproductive HealthEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleFertilityGonadal Steroid HormonesGonadotropinsHumansInfertility, MaleMalePregnancyReproductionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSpermatozoaEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental PollutantsGonadal Steroid HormonesGonadotropinsBisphenol Aepidemiologyhormonesmale reproductivesemen quality

Identifiers

PMID27498136
PMCPMC5242098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.