Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27498101›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2016

ICU Management of the Potential Organ Donor: State of the Art.

Carolina B Maciel, David M Greer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07251777 (Prone vs Supine Position in Potential Organ Donors), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07251777 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Prone vs Supine Position in Potential Organ Donors: PRODONAR Multicenter Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban EcheverríaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled254ConditionsProne Position, Donors, Lung Procurement, Tissue DonorsArmsProne position
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Management of Potential Organ Donor: Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine-Position Statement.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolina B MacielDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208018, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
David M GreerDivision of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208018, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. david.greer@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-organ failure is associated with high mortality and morbidity, in addition to increased health care costs. Organ transplantation is the only definitive treatment that can improve survival and quality of life in such patients; however, due to the persistent mismatch between organ supply and demand, waiting lists continue to grow across the world. Careful intensive care management of the potential organ donor with goal-directed therapy has the potential to optimize organ function and improve donation yield.

Indexed as

Tissue DonorsAnimalsBrain DeathCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsQuality of LifeTissue and Organ ProcurementBrain deathOrgan donationOrgan procurement

Identifiers

PMID27498101
OpenAlexW2480990255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.