Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27498067›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2016

Computing disease incidence, prevalence and comorbidity from electronic medical records.

Steven C Bagley, Russ B Altman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Blood Pressure in Young Adults in Iowa.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Supermarket Proximity and Risk of Hypertension, Diabetes, and CKD: A Retrospective Cohort Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Medical Service Utilization and Direct Medical Cost of Stroke in Urban China.International journal of health policy and management · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Steven C BagleyDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, School of Medicine, MSOB, X-211, 1265 Welch Road, MC 5479, Stanford, CA 94305-5479, USA. Electronic address: steven.bagley@stanford.edu.
Russ B AltmanDepartments of Bioengineering and Genetics, Stanford University, Shriram Room 209, MC 4245, 443 Via Ortega Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-4145, USA. Electronic address: russ.altman@stanford.edu.

Funding

Text Mining for High-fidelity Curation and Discovery of Gene-drug-phenotype RelationshipsR01LM005652 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO · 2000 to 2018
$6.2M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM005652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic medical records (EMR) represent a convenient source of coded medical data, but disease patterns found in EMRs may be biased when compared to surveys based on sampling. In this communication we draw attention to complications that arise when using EMR data to calculate disease prevalence, incidence, age of onset, and disease comorbidity. We review known solutions to these problems and identify challenges for future work.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsEpidemiologyCommunicationComorbidityHumansIncidencePrevalenceBiasComorbidityElectronic medical recordsIncidencePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID27498067
PMCPMC6642638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.