Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27497992›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2016

In vitro promoter recognition by the catalytic subunit of plant phage-type RNA polymerases.

Alexandra-Viola Bohne, Marlene Teubner, Karsten Liere, Andreas Weihe, Thomas Börner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra-Viola BohneInstitute of Biology, Humboldt University, Philippstr.13, Rhoda Erdmann Haus, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Marlene TeubnerInstitute of Biology, Humboldt University, Philippstr.13, Rhoda Erdmann Haus, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Karsten LiereInstitute of Biology, Humboldt University, Philippstr.13, Rhoda Erdmann Haus, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas WeiheInstitute of Biology, Humboldt University, Philippstr.13, Rhoda Erdmann Haus, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas BörnerInstitute of Biology, Humboldt University, Philippstr.13, Rhoda Erdmann Haus, 10115, Berlin, Germany. thomas.boerner@rz.hu-berlin.de.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe identified sequence motifs, which enhance or reduce the ability of the Arabidopsis phage-type RNA polymerases RPOTm (mitochondrial RNAP), RPOTp (plastidial RNAP), and RPOTmp (active in both organelles) to recognize their promoters in vitro with help of a 'specificity loop'. The importance of this data for the evolution and function of the organellar RNA polymerases is discussed. The single-subunit RNA polymerase (RNAP) of bacteriophage T7 is able to perform all steps of transcription without additional transcription factors. Dicotyledonous plants possess three phage-type RNAPs, RPOTm-the mitochondrial RNAP, RPOTp-the plastidial RNAP, and RPOTmp-an RNAP active in both organelles. RPOTm and RPOTp, like the T7 polymerase, are able to recognize promoters, while RPOTmp displays no significant promoter specificity in vitro. To find out which promoter motifs are crucial for recognition by the polymerases we performed in vitro transcription assays with recombinant Arabidopsis RPOTm and RPOTp enzymes. By comparing different truncated and mutagenized promoter constructs, we observed the same minimal promoter sequence supposed to be needed in vivo for transcription initiation. Moreover, we identified elements of core and flanking sequences, which are of critical importance for promoter recognition and activity in vitro. We further intended to reveal why RPOTmp does not efficiently recognize promoters in vitro and if promoter recognition is based on a structurally defined specificity loop of the plant enzymes as described for the yeast and T7 RNAPs. Interestingly, the exchange of only three amino acids within the putative specificity loop of RPOTmp enabled the enzyme for specific promoter transcription in vitro. Thus, also in plant phage-type RNAPs the specificity loop is engaged in promoter recognition. The results are discussed with respect to their relevance for transcription in organello and to the evolution of RPOT enzymes including the divergence of their functions.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCatalytic DomainDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesMitochondriaPromoter Regions, GeneticRNARNA, MitochondrialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRNARNA, MitochondrialArabidopsisChloroplast RNA polymeraseMitochondrial RNA polymerasePhage-type RNA polymerasePromoter recognition

Identifiers

PMID27497992
PMCPMC5040748
OpenAlexW2476601801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.