ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2016
Effectiveness of a barbed suture in the repair of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Report of two cases.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bile Duct Injuries after Cholecystectomy: An Individual Patient Data Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for difficult cases of acute cholecystitis: a simple technique using barbed sutures.Surgical case reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy occurs in rare cases. We report two cases using barbed suture for repair in bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomies. PRESENTATION OF CASES: The first patient was a 73-year-old woman who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis. When the gallbladder was dissected from the bed, bile spillage was observed and an injured small bile duct was detected. The bile duct could not be managed using a titanium clip. The second patient was an 83-year-old woman who underwent emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder torsion. After the gallbladder was dissected from the bed, bile spillage was observed. In both cases, a running suture, of absorbable monofilament 3-0 barbed suture, was used to laparoscopically repair the injuries. DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic repair of a bile duct injury is technically challenging, especially in the gallbladder bed where suturing is very difficult because of the tangential approach and the risk of additional liver laceration. Barbed sutures have the benefit of being knotless, thus, performing a running suture is not difficult, even in laparoscopic procedures. Further, absorbable and monofilament threads are generally better suited for biliary surgery, compared with non-absorbable and braided sutures, because of the potential association of the other types of materials with bile duct stone and stricture formation.
conclusionWe believe that the V-Loc™ device is an effective and appropriate option for bile duct injuries that occur during laparoscopic cholecystectomies, particularly around the gallbladder bed, and it is especially useful for surgeons unfamiliar with intracorporeal knot tying.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.