ReviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2017
Biomedical informatics advancing the national health agenda: the AMIA 2015 year-in-review in clinical and consumer informatics.
Review in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Asynchronous automated electronic laboratory result notifications: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in diabetes management: Advancements, opportunities, and challenges.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Review
- Histopathology images predict multi-omics aberrations and prognoses in colorectal cancer patients.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Large-scale real-world data analysis identifies comorbidity patterns in schizophrenia.Translational psychiatry · 2022Observational
- Unbox the black-box for the medical explainable AI via multi-modal and multi-centre data fusion: A mini-review, two showcases and beyond.An international journal on information fusion · 2022Article
- Health informatics publication trends in Saudi Arabia: a bibliometric analysis over the last twenty-four years.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021Article
- Examining the Use of Real-World Evidence in the Regulatory Process.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020Review
- The Role of PAEHRs in Patient Involvement.Journal of medical systems · 2018Article
- 2016 Year-in-Review of Clinical and Consumer Informatics: Analysis and Visualization of Keywords and Topics.Healthcare informatics research · 2017Review
- A Semantic Parsing Method for Mapping Clinical Questions to Logical Forms.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The field of biomedical informatics experienced a productive 2015 in terms of research. In order to highlight the accomplishments of that research, elicit trends, and identify shortcomings at a macro level, a 19-person team conducted an extensive review of the literature in clinical and consumer informatics. The result of this process included a year-in-review presentation at the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium and a written report (see supplemental data). Key findings are detailed in the report and summarized here. This article organizes the clinical and consumer health informatics research from 2015 under 3 themes: the electronic health record (EHR), the learning health system (LHS), and consumer engagement. Key findings include the following: (1) There are significant advances in establishing policies for EHR feature implementation, but increased interoperability is necessary for these to gain traction. (2) Decision support systems improve practice behaviors, but evidence of their impact on clinical outcomes is still lacking. (3) Progress in natural language processing (NLP) suggests that we are approaching but have not yet achieved truly interactive NLP systems. (4) Prediction models are becoming more robust but remain hampered by the lack of interoperable clinical data records. (5) Consumers can and will use mobile applications for improved engagement, yet EHR integration remains elusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.