Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27497314›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2016

Variation in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with differences in moral judgment.

Regan M Bernhard, Jonathan Chaponis, Richie Siburian, Patience Gallagher, Katherine Ransohoff, Daniel Wikler, Roy H Perlis, Joshua D Greene

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Infection threat shapes our social instincts.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Moral Judgment: An Overlooked Deficient Domain in Multiple Sclerosis?Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Regan M BernhardDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA regan.bernhard@gmail.com.
Jonathan ChaponisPsychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Human Genetics Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 02114, Boston MA, USA.
Richie SiburianPsychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Human Genetics Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 02114, Boston MA, USA.
Patience GallagherPsychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Human Genetics Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 02114, Boston MA, USA.
Katherine RansohoffStanford University School of Medicine, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA.
Daniel WiklerDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
Roy H PerlisPsychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Human Genetics Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, 02114, Boston MA, USA.
Joshua D GreeneDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, 02138, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Center for Human Genetics · USHarvard University · USHarvard Global Health Institute · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USStanford University · US

Funding

Upgrade Siemens MAGNETOM Trio to MAGNETOM Prisma Fit 3T Human MRI SystemS10OD020039 · OD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BUCKNER, RANDY L · 2015 to 2015
$600k
NIH HHS S10 OD020039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moral judgments are produced through the coordinated interaction of multiple neural systems, each of which relies on a characteristic set of neurotransmitters. Genes that produce or regulate these neurotransmitters may have distinctive influences on moral judgment. Two studies examined potential genetic influences on moral judgment using dilemmas that reliably elicit competing automatic and controlled responses, generated by dissociable neural systems. Study 1 (N = 228) examined 49 common variants (SNPs) within 10 candidate genes and identified a nominal association between a polymorphism (rs237889) of the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) and variation in deontological vs utilitarian moral judgment (that is, judgments favoring individual rights vs the greater good). An association was likewise observed for rs1042615 of the arginine vasopressin receptor gene (AVPR1A). Study 2 (N = 322) aimed to replicate these findings using the aforementioned dilemmas as well as a new set of structurally similar medical dilemmas. Study 2 failed to replicate the association with AVPR1A, but replicated the OXTR finding using both the original and new dilemmas. Together, these findings suggest that moral judgment is influenced by variation in the oxytocin receptor gene and, more generally, that single genetic polymorphisms can have a detectable effect on complex decision processes.

Indexed as

Ethical TheoryMoralsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdolescentAdultHumansJudgmentMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, OxytocinSocial BehaviorYoung AdultReceptors, Oxytocindecision-makinggeneticsmorality

Identifiers

PMID27497314
PMCPMC5141955
OpenAlexW2499412244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.